Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 12;27(10):1271–1277. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6845

Table 4.

Odds Ratio Estimates of Diagnosis Status and Glycemic Control from Logistic Regression in Diabetes Subclass (n = 535)

  Diagnosis statusa Glycemic controlb
  Undiagnosed diabetes A1C ≥6.5%
  aOR (95% CI) Adjusted Wald test aOR (95% CI) Adjusted Wald test
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic white Ref. p < 0.001 Ref. p < 0.001
 Non-Hispanic black 11.2 (6.3–19.9)***   15.6 (7.6–32.2)***  
 Hispanic 2.8 (1.0–8.1)   1.9 (0.9–4.0)  
 Native American c   c  
 Asian 0.4 (0.1–1.7)   1.2 (0.5–2.7)  
Education
 College graduate or more Ref. p = 0.13 Ref. p = 0.48
 Some college or vocational school 1.0 (0.5–1.9)   1.3 (0.6–2.7)  
 High school graduate 0.7 (0.3–1.8)   1.8 (0.6–5.0)  
 Less than high school 0.3 (0.1–0.9)*   2.3 (0.7–7.6)  
Insurance
 Private insurance Ref. p = 0.36 Ref. p = 0.31
 Medicaid 1.6 (0.7–3.4)   1.0 (0.4–2.4)  
 No insurance 1.5 (0.7–3.2)   1.9 (0.8–4.9)  
Access to care
 Had access Ref. p = 0.81 Ref. p = 0.13
 Lacked access 1.1 (0.6–1.9)   1.7 (0.9–3.2)  
Diagnosis status
 Diagnosed NA   Ref. p = 0.002
 Undiagnosed     3.2 (1.8–5.8)***  
a

Reference category is being diagnosed (self-reported diabetes history or antihyperglycemic medication use).

b

Reference category is A1C <6.5%, which the ADA recommends before becoming pregnant.9

c

Cell count too small to publish as per Add Health guidelines.

*

p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

ADA, American Diabetes Association.