Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 29;13(10):e0206685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206685

Table 2. Correlation of ALDH1 and CD44 expression score with clinicopathological features in endometrial carcinoma.

ALDH1Low ALDH1High   CD44- CD44+
Characteristic ≤10 >10 P value - + P value
Patients (no.) 52 40 58 34
Age (years) 0.370 0.049
Range 31–80 33–88 31–83 33–88
Mean±SEM 54.35±1.40 56.65±2.13 53.52±1.40 58.47±2.20
FIGO Stage [no. (%)] 1.000 0.537
I, II 36 (57.10) 27 (42.90) 41 (65.1) 22 (34.9)
III 15 (55.60) 12 (44.40) 15 (55.6) 12 (44.4)
Nuclear grade [no. (%)] 0.651 0.003
Grade 1 24 (61.54) 15 (38.46) 32 (82.05) 7 (17.95)
Grade 2 15 (55.56) 12 (44.44) 15 (55.56) 12 (44.44)
Grade 3 13 (50.00) 13 (50.00) 11 (42.31) 15 (57.69)
Histological type [no. (%)] 0.781a 0.012a
Clear cell carcinoma 3 (50.00) 3 (50.00) 1 (16.67) 5 (83.33)
Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma 41 (56.94) 31 (43.06) 50 (69.44) 22 (30.56)
Mucinous Carcinoma 2 (100.00) 0 (0) 2 (100.00) 0 (0)
Serous Carcinoma 6 (50.00) 6 (50.00) 5 (41.67) 7 (58.33)
Histological type [no. (%)] 0.557 0.019
Type I EC (EmAC G1 and G2) + MC 39 (59.1) 27 (40.9) 47 (71.2) 19 (28.8)
Type II EC (CC, SC) + EmAC G3 13 (50.0) 13 (50.0) 11 (42.3) 15 (57.7)

a Fisher’s exact test.

CC: clear cell carcinoma; EmAC: endometrioid adenocarcinoma; MC: mucinous carcinoma; SC: serous carcinoma.