Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 29;13(10):e0206685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206685

Table 3. Correlation of combination of ALDH1 and CD44 expression score with clinicopathological features in endometrial carcinoma.

Both At least one Both
Characteristic ≤ median > median > median P value
Patients (no.) 36 38 18
Age range (years) 31–77 40–83 33–88  0.162
Mean ± SEM 52.72±1.67 56.16±1.77 58.89±3.63
FIGO Stage [no. (%)] 0.777
I, II 26 (41.3) 25 (39.7) 12 (19.0)
III 9 (33.3) 12 (44.4) 6 (22.3)
Nuclear grade [no. (%)] 0.048
Grade 1 21 (53.85) 14 (35.90) 4 (10.26)
Grade 2 8 (29.63) 14 (51.85) 5 (18.52)
Grade 3 7 (26.92) 10 (38.46) 9 (34.62)
Histological type [no. (%)] 0.165a
Clear cell carcinoma 1 (16.67) 2 (33.33) 3 (50.00)
Endometrioid Adenocarcinom 30 (41.67) 31 (43.06) 11 (15.28)
Mucinous Carcinoma 2 (100.00) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Serous Carcinoma 3 (25.00) 5 (41.67) 4 (33.33)
Histological type [no. (%)] 0.059
Type I EC (EmAC G1 and G2) + MC 29 (43.9) 28 (42.5) 9 (13.6)
Type II EC (CC, SC) + EmAC G3 7 (26.9) 10 (38.5) 9 (34.6)

a Fisher’s exact test.

SEM: standard error of the mean, CC: clear cell carcinoma; EmAC: endometrioid adenocarcinoma; MC: mucinous carcinoma; SC: serous carcinoma.