Table 3.

Random effects meta-analysis according to the method of blood pressure measurement, follow-up length, type of composite event and ethnicity in the comparison between masked uncontrolled hypertension and controlled hypertension

Variable	Studies	Subjects/Events	Adjusted HR (95% CI)	P
Method of BP measurement
ABPM*,†,‡,§,║,¶	6	12610/933	1.83 (1.52−2.21)	0.75
HBPM#,**,††,‡‡,§§	5	17742/394	1.75 (1.38−2.20)
Mean follow-up length
≤ 5 years*,¶,#,**,§§	5	26962/672	1.77 (1.41−2.22)	0.82
≥ 5 years†,‡,§,║,††,‡‡	6	3390/655	1.83 (1.49−2.24)
Type of composite event
Stroke + CAD + HF + PR*,†,‡	3	1791/404	1.70 (1.27−2.27)	0.76
Stroke + CAD + HF #,††,‡‡	3	2000/241	2.06 (1.49−2.84)
Stroke + CAD║,**,§§	3	16149/191	1.64 (1.16−2.31)
All-cause mortality§,¶	2	10412/491	1.85 (1.36−2.51)
Ethnicity
Caucasian only*,†,§,¶,#	5	12586/719	1.96 (1.69−2.29)	0.02
Asian only**,§§	2	15742/153	1.38 (1.04−1.83)
Black included║,‡‡	2	700/92	2.83 (1.81−4.42)
Caucasian, Asian, Hispanic‡,††	2	1324/363	1.58 (1.28−1.96)

ABPM, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; HBPM, home blood pressure measurement; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; PR, peripheral revascularization.

^*OvA Study;

^†Chieti-Pescara Study;

^‡IDACO Study;

^§Hadassah Study;

^║Jackson Heart Study (included 100% Black patients);

^¶Spanish Registry Study;

^#SHEAF Study;

^**J-HEALTH Study;

^††IDHOCO Study;

^‡‡Dallas Heart Study (included 50% Black patients);

^§§HONEST Study.