Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 23;12:246. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00246

Table 6.

Hazard ratios for latency to look at the photo, sniff the photo, sniff the environment, and enter the zone closest to the dog window as affected by treatment group.

Latency to Group Mean1 Coefficient2 SE (coeff) Hazard ratio3 Wald (z) P
Look at photo Control 2.7 Reference
Anxious 5.6 −0.674 0.35 0.51 (0.25–1.02) −1.91 0.057
Depressed 8.0 −1.203 0.39 0.30 (0.14–0.65) −3.08 0.002
Anxious Reference
Depressed −0.529 0.37 0.59 (0.29–1.20) −1.45 0.147
Sniff photo Control 5.6 Reference
Anxious 18.4 −0.644 0.37 0.53 (0.26–1.08) −1.75 0.08
Depressed 13.3 −0.787 0.38 0.46 (0.22–0.95) −2.09 0.037
Anxious Reference
Depressed −0.143 0.35 0.87 (0.44–1.70) −0.41 0.69
Sniff environment Control 38.1 Reference
Anxious 123.3 −1.892 0.46 0.15 (0.06–0.37) −4.12 <0.001
Depressed 73.5 −0.894 0.40 0.41 (0.19–0.90) −2.23 0.026
Anxious Reference
Depressed 0.998 0.44 2.7 (1.2–6.4) 2.29 0.022
Enter zone closest to dog Control 132.0 Reference
Anxious 179.4 −2.395 1.07 0.09 (0.01–0.74) −2.24 0.025
Depressed 163.2 −0.5684 0.59 0.57 (0.18–1.79) −0.97 0.333
Anxious Reference
Depressed 1.83 1.10 6.20 (0.73–53.0) 1.67 0.095

1Raw mean latencies are given. 2Regression coefficient from the Cox-proportional hazards model. 395% confidence interval given in parentheses. Significant P-values are shown in bold.