Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 24;8(20):10306–10325. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4507

Table 2.

Hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of COI, 16S, and 28S for all sampled lineages of Pygmarrhopalites and Pogonognathellus grouped by cave

Source of variation COI 16S 28S
df SS VC V% ϕ‐Statistics df SS VC V% ϕ‐Statistics df SS VC V% ϕ‐Statistics
Pygmarrhopalites
 Among caves 15 1,785.70 20.53 28.62 ϕct = 0.29** 14 658.50 6.60 22.48 ϕct = 0.23* 15 346.28 1.80 10.70 ϕct = 0.11
 Among samples within caves 13 829.91 34.20 47.68 ϕsc = 0.67** 12 343.73 16.46 56.08 ϕsc = 0.72** 13 238.20 10.00 60.00 ϕsc = 0.67**
 Within samples 13 221.08 17.01 23.71 ϕst = 0.76*** 12 75.50 6.29 21.44 ϕst = 0.79*** 11 53.80 4.90 29.30 ϕst = 0.71***
Pogonognathellus
 Among caves 10 337.90 11.61 56.37 ϕct = 0.56* 9 193.08 7.66 60.61 ϕct = 0.61* 9 11.27 0.03 2.50 ϕct = 0.03
 Among samples within caves 13 130.02 8.49 41.21 ϕsc = 0.94 12 67.50 4.98 39.39 ϕsc = 1.00 11 13.50 0.68 56.22 ϕsc = 0.58
 Within samples 2 1.00 0.50 2.43 ϕst = 0.98* 2 0.00 0.00 0.00 ϕst = 1.00* 1 0.50 0.50 41.28 ϕst = 0.03

df: degrees of freedom; SS: sum of squares; VC: variance components; V%: percent of variation.

Significance is based on 50,000 permutations: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.