Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 24;8(20):10306–10325. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4507

Table 6.

Bayes factor comparisons of marginal likelihood estimates from stepping‐stone sampling analysis for each topological hypothesis (H 0– H 2) to determine support for reciprocal monophyly across the Mississippi Valley (H 0) for Pygmarrhopalites A10 and Pogonognathellus T4

H 0 H 1 H 2 2 × loge BF H 0 vs. H 1 2 × loge BF H 0 vs. H 2
Pygmarrhopalites A10 −16,060.28 −16,070.25 −16,066.01 19.94 11.46
Pogonognathellus T4 −7,349.78 −7,297.37 — −104.82 —

BF values in bold indicate strong support for H 0.

H 0 = IL + MO.

H 1 (Pygmarrhopalites) = (INC + SSC) + (STC + HSC + PAC); H 1 (Pogonognathellus) = TMC + (ILC + HSC) & (AC1 + AC2) + (PAC + FPC + MJP).

H 2 = INC + ((SCC) + (STC + HSC + PAC)).