Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 14;9(5):721–730. doi: 10.1007/s13244-018-0635-0

Table 5.

Variations in radiographer responses in identifying different types of MR image-quality errors

Error Category Group Control N = 16 Experimental N = 19 Number of images Total Number of responses Number (%) correct (pre-test) Number (%) Dis-improved Number (%) incorrect (pre-test) Number (%) improved
SNR (Signal to noise ratio) Control 4 64 40 (62.5%) 7 (16.3%) 24 (37.5%) 6 (25%)
Experimental 76 44 (57.9%) 15 (34.1%) 32 (42.1%) 18 (56.3%)
CNR (Contrast to noise ratio) Control 6 96 67 (69.8%) 10 (15.9%) 29 (30.2%) 7 (24.1%)
Experimental 114 65 (57.02%) 0 (0%) 49 (43%) 40 (81.6%)
SR (Spatial resolution) Control 2 32 11 (34.4%) 3 (27.2%) 21 (65.6%) 4 (19%)
Experimental 38 17 (44.7%) 0 (0%) 21 (55.3%) 21 (100%)
Artefact Control 7 112 51 (45.5%) 4 (7.8%) 61 (54.5%) 4 (6.6%)
Experimental 133 74 (55.6%) 3 (4.1%) 59 (44.4%) 37 (62.7%)
No Technical Error Evident Control 5 80 62 (77.5%) 7 (11.3%) 18 (22.5%) 6 (33.3%)
Experimental 95 73 (76.9%) 7 (9.6%) 22 (23.2%) 19 (86.4%)
SNR and CNR Control 1 16 10 (62.5%) 2 (20%) 6 (37.5%) 0 (0%)
Experimental 19 15 (78.9%) 0 (0%) 4 (21.1%) 4 (100%)