Table 4.

Statistical analysis compared the different MBL between the two groups in every single stage.

T0	0,0435625	T-ratio	-0,220803459
t0 b	0,0621875	DF	15
Mean difference	-0,018625	Prob > |t|		0,8282
Std. error	0,084351034	Prob > t		0,5859
Upper 95%	0,161164972	Prob < t		0,4141
Lower%	0,198414972
N	16
Correlation	0,211215722
T1	-0,2768125	T-ratio	-3,690326917
T1 b	0,15328125	DF	15
Mean difference	-0,43009375	Prob > |t|		0,0022
Std. error	0,116546246	Prob > t		0,9989
Upper 95%	-0,181681306	Prob < t		0,0011
Lower%	-0,678506194
N	16
Correlation	0,060006213
T2	-0,62671875	T-ratio	-4,200440951
T2 b	-0,2736875	DF	15
Mean difference	-0,35303125	Prob > |t|		0,0008
Std. error	0,084046236	Prob > t		0,9996
Upper 95%	-0,173890939	Prob < t		0,0004
Lower%	-0,532171561
N	16
Correlation	0,394342209
T3	-0,846	T-ratio	-3,483100821
T3 b	-0,54834375	DF	15
Mean difference	-0,29765625	Prob > |t|		0,0033
Std. error	0,085457259	Prob > t		0,9983
Upper 95%	-0,115508414	Prob < t		0,0017
Lower%	-0,479804086
N	16
Correlation	0,407963714
T4	-1,033375	T-ratio	-2,787533871
T4 b	-0,69665625	DF	15
Mean difference	-0,33671875	Prob > |t|		0,0138
Std. error	0,120794496	Prob > t		0,9931
Upper 95%	-0,079251376	Prob < t		0,0069
Lower%	-0,594186124
N	16
Correlation	0,103410841