Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 29;18:168. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1269-6

Table 5.

Number of Lactobacillus strains carrying resistance genesa

Resistant gene → tetL tetM tetW ermB ermC lnuA tetL+ tetM tetL+ tetM + ermB tetW + ermB ermB + lnuA cat ant(6)-Ia (aadE) lsaE lsaE + ant(6)-Ia (aadE) int-Tn (Tn916/Tn1545)
L. salivarius (n=22) 14
(64%)
12
(54.5%)
0 9
(41%)
4
(18%)
3
(14%)
12
(54.5%)
8
(36%)
0 2
(9%)
0 3
(14%)
3
(14%)
3
(14%)
3
(14%)
L. agilis (n=2) 2
(100%)
2
(100%)
0 1
(50%)
0 0 2
(100%)
1
(50%)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L. saerimneri (n=3) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
L. johnsonii (n=6) 0 0 5
(83%)
2
(33%)
0 0 0 0 2
(33%)
0 0 0 0 0 0
L. crispatus (n=13) 4
(31%)
4
(31%)
8
(61.5%)
7
(54%)
0 0 4
(31%)
2
(15%)
4
(31%)
0 0 0 0 0 0
L. oris (n=5) 4
(80%)
0 4
(80%)
4
(80%)
0 5
(100%)
0 0 4
(80%)
4
(80%)
0 0 0 0 0
L. ingluviei (n=9) 1
(11%)
0 5
(55.5%)
5
(55.5%)
0 1
(11%)
0 0 5
(55.5%)
1
(11%)
6
(67%)
0 0 0 0
L. reuteri (n=2) 0 0 1
(50%)
0 0 2
(100%)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total: 62 25
(40%)
18
(29%)
23
(37%)
28
(45%)
4
(7%)
11
(18%)
18
(29%)
11
(18%)
15
(24%)
7
(11%)
6
(10%)
3
(5%)
3
(5%)
3
(5%)
3
(5%)

a- none of the isolate contained the resistance genes: tetK, tetO, ermA, mefA/E, msrC, blaZ, mecA, aph(3’)-IIIa, aac(6’)-Ie-aph(2”)-Ia, aph(2”)-Ic, aph(2”)-Id, ant(4’)-Ia and aac(6’)-Ii