Table 2.
Factors influencing the uptake of eRehabilitation programs after stroke
| Level | Factor | Sub-factor | Patient and informal caregiver | Professional |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation | Accessibility | Period in which eRehabilitation is accessible | x | x |
| Devices on which eRehabilitation is accessible | x | x | ||
| Feasibility | Helpdesk function | x | x | |
| Tailored to patients’ situation | x | x | ||
| Attractiveness | Ease of use of eRehabilitation | x | x | |
| Content of eRehabilitation program | x | x | ||
| Privacy | Privacy and safety of patient data | x | x | |
| Advantages of use | Characteristic of innovation offering added value | x | x | |
| Organizational context | Organization of care | Tasks and responsibilities healthcare professional | x | x |
| Tasks and responsibilities informal caregiver | x | x | ||
| Tasks and responsibilities organization | x | |||
| Resources | Software | x | x | |
| Hardware | x | |||
| Space at home | x | |||
| Time | Time | x | x | |
| Individual patients | Motivation to change | Reasons (not) to use eRehabilitation for patients | x | x |
| Knowledge | Knowledge about use of eRehabilitation | x | ||
| Skill | Skills with use eRehabilitation | x | ||
| Patient characteristics | Impairment after stroke | x | x | |
| Individual professional | Motivation to change | Reasons (not) to use eRehabilitation for professionals | x | |
| Economic and political context | Financial arrangements | Insurance | x | x |