Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 30.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug 30;18(10):2483–2495. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15040

TABLE 4.

Cost‐effectiveness of treatment strategies for hepatitis C virus infection among kidney waitlist candidates by fibrosis stage at waitlist addition

Treatment strategy cost, $ Incremental
cost, $
QALM Incremental
QALM
ICER, $/
QALY
Undiscounted
life months
5 y budget
impact, $
Overall
 Treat posttransplant 682 400 61.8 164.8 391 560 600
 Treat pretransplant 735 700 53 300 65.6  3.9 162 800 164.5 419 087 100
F0
 Treat posttransplant 696 200 69.5 167.8 393 551 000
 Treat pretransplant 736 000 39 800 68.5 −1.1 Dom 164.0 418 573 200
F1
 Treat posttransplant 689 400 67.9 165.7 395 221 600
 Treat pretransplant 732 200 42 800 68.6  0.7 722 800 164.3 419 620 700
F2
 Treat posttransplant 690 500 65.5 167.2 393 873 200
 Treat pretransplant 741 000 50 500 69.1  3.6 167 200 166.1 421 481 700
F3
 Treat posttransplant 676 600 58.7 163.4 391 384 200
 Treat pretransplant 736 500 59 900 67.5  8.8 82 000 164.3 418 446 000
F4
 Treat posttransplant 663 000 49.3 160.5 383 726 900
 Treat pretransplant 731 500 68 500 54.1  4.7 173 800 163.2 416 710 350

Dom, dominated (more costly, and less effective); QALM, quality adjusted life month; ICER, incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio; QALY, quality adjusted life years.