Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 30.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug 30;18(10):2483–2495. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15040

TABLE 5.

Cost‐effectiveness of treatment strategies for hepatitis C virus infection among kidney waitlist by availability of HCV+ organs (HCV+ candidates transplanted more quickly)

Treatment strategy Cost, $ Incremental
cost, $
QALM Incremental
QALM
ICER, $/
QALY
Undiscounted
life months
5 y budget
impact, $
6 mo diff.
 Treat posttransplant 700 700 59.3 162.5 412 996 200
 Treat pretransplant 736 000 35 300 65.2 5.9 71 500 164.2 423 081 000
9 mo diff.
 Treat posttransplant 690 700 60.4 163.5 407 400 300
 Treat pretransplant 734 900 44 200 65.3 5.0 107 100 164.3 421 939 000
12 mo diff.
 Treat posttransplant 682 400 61.8 164.8 383 726 900
 Treat pretransplant 735 700 53 300 65.6 3.9 162 800 164.5 416 710 300
18 mo diff.
 Treat posttransplant 658 300 63.9 167.1 386 909 800
 Treat pretransplant 730 900 72 500 65.7 1.8 489 000 164.8 413 829 900
24 mo diff.
 Treat posttransplant 634 000 66.5 169.4 374 017 500
 Treat pretransplant 725 600 91 600 66.11 −0.3 Dom 165.3 407 602 500

Dom, dominated (more costly and less effective); QALM, quality‐adjusted life month; ICER, incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio; QALY, quality‐adjusted life year.