Table 3.
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analyses Among Trans-Feminine Individuals of the Relationship Between Past 3-Month Tobacco Use (Dependent Variable) and Markers of Gender Transition (n = 631)
| Model A | Model B | Model C | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 = 0.025 | R2 = 0.35 | R2 = 0.062 | ||||||||||
| β | SE | Odds | 95% CI | β | SE | Odds | 95% CI | β | SE | Odds | 95% CI | |
| Age | −0.01 | 0.007 | 0.98 | 0.97–1.00 | −0.02 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 0.97–1.00 | −0.01 | 0.01 | 0.99 | 0.87–1.00 |
| Race (ref White) | −0.11 | 0.22 | 0.89 | 0.58–1.38 | −0.05 | 0.22 | 0.94 | 0.61–1.47 | −0.05 | 0.23 | 0.95 | 0.60–1.48 |
| Income (ref >2 × 2003 U.S. DHHS Poverty Guideline) | −0.09 | 0.21 | 0.92 | 0.61–1.37 | 0.03 | 0.21 | 1.00 | 0.65–1.51 | 0.001 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 0.65–1.53 |
| Educational attainment | ||||||||||||
| High school or less | 0.27 | 0.28 | 1.31 | 0.75–2.29 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 1.27 | 0.73–2.23 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 1.21 | 0.69–2.12 |
| Some college | 0.47 | 0.19 | 1.60* | 1.11–2.32 | 0.44 | 0.19 | 1.55 | 1.07–2.26 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 1.51 | 1.03–2.21 |
| College degree or higher (ref) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Enacted stigma | 0.096 | 0.05 | 1.10* | 1.01–1.21 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 1.14* | 1.03–1.25 | ||||
| Felt stigma | 0.70 | 0.10 | 1.07 | 0.88–1.30 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 1.02 | 0.83–1.24 | ||||
| Legal document gender-marker change | −0.95 | 0.47 | 0.39* | 0.15–0.96 | ||||||||
| Past 3-month hormone use | −0.19 | 0.19 | 0.83 | 0.57–1.21 | ||||||||
| Gender-affirming surgery | 0.20 | 0.35 | 0.68 | 0.62–2.41 | ||||||||
Model A contains only demographic covariates. Model B added enacted stigma and felt stigma. Model C added markers of gender transition.
*
Statistically significant at p < 0.05.
CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error.