Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Microbiol. 2018 Sep 16;110(3):357–369. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14086

Figure 5. Experimental data and best fit by Model III.

Figure 5.

A) Copper uptake kinetics in the presence of 0.5 mM CuSO4 (Quintana et al. 2017). B) Compartmental distribution of copper levels 1, 10 and 30 min after the addition of 0.5 mM CuSO4, solid line is for periplasmic and dashed line is for cytoplasmic fraction. C, D) Copper uptake kinetics in the presence of 2 mM and 4 mM CuSO4. E) Copper uptake kinetics of the insertional mutant ΔcopA1 in the presence of 0.5 mM copper. F) Compartmental distribution of copper levels in the insertional mutant ΔcopA1 1, 10 and 30 min after the addition of 0.5 mM CuSO4, solid line is for periplasmic and dashed line is for cytoplasmic fraction. Solid lines represent the best fit to the data using Model III (parameter values in Table 1). Experimental data are the mean ± standard deviation of 3 independent replicates.