Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2018 Apr 30;90(6):2001–2018. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13065

Table 3.

Indirect effects of mediation models predicting Child Executive Function

Model 1 Model 2

b SE β b SE β
Risk → 15-month NDW → EF 0.01 0.01 .01 0.01 0.01 .01
Risk → 15-month MLU → EF 0.00 0.01 .00 0.00 0.01 .00
Risk → 24-month NDW → EF −0.04 0.01 −.06 *** −0.03 0.01 −.03 *
Risk → 24-month MLU → EF 0.00 0.01 .00 0.00 0.01 .01
Risk → 36-month NDW → EF 0.01 0.01 .01 −0.00 0.01 −.00
Risk → 36-month MLU → EF −0.01 0.01 −.02 * −0.01 0.01 −.01
Risk → Vocabulary → EF −0.05 0.01 −.07 ***
15-month NDW → Vocabulary → EF 0.00 0.00 .00
15-month MLU → Vocabulary → EF −0.01 0.01 −.01
24-month NDW → Vocabulary → EF 0.00 0.00 .07 ***
24-month MLU → Vocabulary → EF 0.01 0.01 .02
36-month NDW → Vocabulary → EF −0.00 0.00 −.04
36-month MLU → Vocabulary → EF 0.04 0.01 .06 ***
Risk → 15-month NDW → Vocabulary → EF −0.00 0.00 −.00
Risk → 15-month MLU → Vocabulary → EF 0.00 0.00 .00
Risk → 24-month NDW → Vocabulary → EF −0.02 0.00 −.02 ***
Risk → 24-month MLU → Vocabulary → EF −0.00 0.00 −.00
Risk → 36-month NDW → Vocabulary → EF 0.01 0.00 .01
Risk → 36-month MLU → Vocabulary → EF −0.01 0.00 −.01 ***

Note. NDW = number of different words; MLU = mean length utterance; EF = executive function;

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001