Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 5;80(10):1631–1638. doi: 10.1292/jvms.17-0456

Table 2. Pairwise FST below the diagonal and gene flow (Nm, above the diagonal) between raccoon dog populations.

Nm 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
FST
1. SG (30) 21.987 17.863 8.355 8.005 5.992 7.261
2. WG (30) 0.006a) 14.288 6.045 5.454 4.856 6.183
3. EG (27) 0.009a) 0.015a) 8.723 8.446 6.464 7.056
4. CC (19) 0.027a) 0.047a) 0.025a) 10.969 6.158 6.166
5. JB (29) 0.038a) 0.065a) 0.036a) 0.016ns 10.225 4.902
6. JN (29) 0.056a) 0.072a) 0.051a) 0.049a) 0.029a) 5.467
7. GS (30) 0.048a) >0.059a) >0.049a) 0.050a) 0.076a) 0.066a)

a) Significant after Bonferroni correction (P<0.003); ns, not significant; Indirect indicator of gene flow (Nm) was calculated among geographic populations using the equation, Nm = 1/4{(1-FST)/FST}.