Table 2. Pairwise FST below the diagonal and gene flow (Nm, above the diagonal) between raccoon dog populations.
| Nm | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FST | |||||||
| 1. SG (30) | 21.987 | 17.863 | 8.355 | 8.005 | 5.992 | 7.261 | |
| 2. WG (30) | 0.006a) | 14.288 | 6.045 | 5.454 | 4.856 | 6.183 | |
| 3. EG (27) | 0.009a) | 0.015a) | 8.723 | 8.446 | 6.464 | 7.056 | |
| 4. CC (19) | 0.027a) | 0.047a) | 0.025a) | 10.969 | 6.158 | 6.166 | |
| 5. JB (29) | 0.038a) | 0.065a) | 0.036a) | 0.016ns | 10.225 | 4.902 | |
| 6. JN (29) | 0.056a) | 0.072a) | 0.051a) | 0.049a) | 0.029a) | 5.467 | |
| 7. GS (30) | 0.048a) | >0.059a) | >0.049a) | 0.050a) | 0.076a) | 0.066a) |
a) Significant after Bonferroni correction (P<0.003); ns, not significant; Indirect indicator of gene flow (Nm) was calculated among geographic populations using the equation, Nm = 1/4{(1-FST)/FST}.