Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;19:301. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1107-y

Table 5.

Comparison of clinical parameters between UMOD positive and negative patients with ADTKD

Clinical parameter UMOD positive UMOD negative Significance level (p < 0.0036)
Age at presentation [years] 9–57, median 39, n = 21 23–80, median 49, n = 20 p = 0.024*
Age at RRT [years] 27–66, median 47, n = 27 27–83, median 51.5, n = 16 p = 0.606*
Gout 15/33 patients (45%) 10/25 patients (40%) p = 0.678**
Allopurinol use 13/35 patients (37%) 6/25 patients (24%) p = 0.281**
Hypertension at presentation 31/35 patients (89%) 22/25 patients (88%) p = 1.0***
Hyperuricaemia (Uric acid > 0.35 umol/l) 24/26 patients (92%) 15/19 patients (79%) p = 0.377***
Uric Acid [mg/dl] 4.71–13.28, median 7.75, n = 25 4.54–12.27, median 8.07, n = 19 p = 0.61*
Proteinuria 8/22 patients (36%) 6/17 patients (35%) p = 0.945**
Protein Creatinine Ratio [mg/g] 0–2761, median 234.5, n = 18 53–2469, median 624, n = 14 p = 0.065*
Anaemia pre RRT (Hb < 100 g/l) 4/27 patients (15%) 7/22 patients (32%) p = 0.185***
Microscopic haematuria 1/27 patients (4%) 1/19 patients (5%) p = 1.0***
Renal cysts 4/21 patients (19%) 4/15 patients (27%) p = 0.694***
Normal renal size at presentation (renal diameter > 9 cm) 11/23 patients (48%) 12/19 patients (63%) p = 0.32**
Electrolyte abnormalities 6/32 patients (19%) 1/22 patients (5%) p = 0.22***

* = Mann Whitney U, ** = χ2, *** = Fisher’s Exact test