Table 1.
Imaging technique | Pathological specificity for Alzheimer’s disease | Prediction of progression in cognitively normal | Prediction of progression in MCI | Reproducibility | Sensitivity to change | Response to treatment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Molecular | Amyloid PET | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Good | Moderate | Established |
Tau PET | Preliminary evidence with promising results | Unknown | Unknown | Preliminary evidence | Unknown | Unknown | |
Functional | ASL | Moderate | Weak | Weak | Moderate | Preliminary evidence | Preliminary evidence for exercise intervention |
rs-fMRI | Moderate | Unknown | Weak | Moderate | Preliminary evidence | Preliminary evidence for symptomatic drugs | |
FDG-PET | Moderate | Moderate/good | Strong | Good | Good | Established for symptomatic drugs | |
Structural | T1: Hippocampal volume | Moderate | Good; although long follow-up is needed | Strong | Good | Good | Established, although few effective studies |
T1: Cortical atrophy | Moderate | Moderate/good depending on regions; long follow-up is needed | Good | Good | Good | Unknown | |
DTI | Moderate | Weak | Moderate | Moderate | Unknown | Unknown |
AD Alzheimer’s disease, ASL arterial spin labelling, DTI diffusion tensor imaging, FDG fluorodeoxyglucose, MCI mild cognitive impairment, PET positron emission tomography, rs-fMRI resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging