Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 31;9:4539. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06563-w

Table 2.

Statistical analysis of cancer cell movements in vivo

Cell type MSD (α) MLE for μ Akaike weights
Truncated power law TP P E
B16-F0
 Zone 1 1.03 ± 0.04 3.58 ± 0.24 0.77 0.22 < 0.01
 Zone 2 1.38 ± 0.04 3.57 ± 0.21 0.57 0.42 < 0.01
 Zone 3 0.99 ± 0.04 3.85 ± 0.35 0.59 0.40 < 0.01
 Zone 4
B16-F10
 Zone 1 1.07 ± 0.07 4.97 ± 0.55 0.58 0.41 < 0.01
 Zone 2 1.63 ± 0.06 2.34 ± 0.21 0.90 0.09 < 0.01
 Zone 3 1.47 ± 0.05 2.66 ± 0.26 0.93 0.06 < 0.01
 Zone 4 1.87 ± 0.05 2.03 ± 0.22 0.99 < 0.01 < 0.01

TP  truncated power law, P  power law, E  exponential distribution

Table summarizes exponent α values and the maximum likelihood estimates, MLEs70, of the truncated power law exponents μ for cancer cell movements in vivo for the data described in Fig. 3 and 4 (± values give the 95% confidence intervals). Lower cutoff value was a = 5 min for all in vivo data sets. Away from the tumor, in zones 2–4, Akaike weights heavily favor truncated power law with 2<μ<3 (shown in bold) indicating Lévy walks for B16-F10. For B16F0 for all zones, distributions correspond to truncated power law with μ>3 indicating diffusive walks. See Supplementary Movies 7 and 8. Statistics were based on the following numbers of cells and time points − B16-F0, zone #1 (n = 59 cells, m = 2,925 data points); zone #2 (n = 57, m = 2,806); zone #3 (n = 28, m = 1,383). B16-F10, zone #1 (n = 30 cells, m = 990 data points); zone #2 (n = 30, m = 990); zone #3 (n = 29, m = 957); zone #4 (n = 23, m = 759)