Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 15;44(4):591–603. doi: 10.1007/s10867-018-9508-5

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of the Runge–Kutta numerical integration results for the normalized velocity profile (using Eqs. (33) and (34)), the analytical solution, Eq. (41) and the numerical solutions in [16, 17] for the case HT = 0.45, using Kμ = 0.62, Kc = 0.41 (ζ = 1.512) and Hm = 0.67