Table 7.
Summary of group contrasts of testing the interaction of river and specialization cluster on place identity
| Contrast | Group | M adj | t |
|---|---|---|---|
| DU river | Casual vs. intermediate | 3.47 | −5.68* |
| 4.26 | |||
| Casual vs. advanced | 3.47 | −5.42* | |
| 4.59 | |||
| Intermediate vs. advanced | 4.26 | −1.67 | |
| 4.59 | |||
| NU river | Casual vs. intermediate | 3.68 | −5.62* |
| 4.31 | |||
| Casual vs. advanced | 3.68 | −1.35 | |
| 4.75 | |||
| Intermediate vs. advanced | 4.31 | −0.56 | |
| 4.75 | |||
| SA river | Casual vs. intermediate | 3.56 | −4.16* |
| 3.92 | |||
| Casual vs. advanced | 3.56 | −1.80 | |
| 4.11 | |||
| Intermediate vs. advanced | 3.92 | −0.62 | |
| 4.11 | |||
| LY river | Casual vs. intermediate | 3.26 | −8.89* |
| 4.04 | |||
| Casual vs. advanced | 3.26 | −4.68* | |
| 4.30 | |||
| Intermediate vs. advanced | 4.04 | −1.22 | |
| 4.30 |
Madj adjusted mean place identity
*p < .05