Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 29;35(12):159. doi: 10.1007/s12032-018-1220-6

Table 2.

Ranking of genes according to mean relative fall in expression

Pos. Gene ΔΔCT 95% CI 2− ΔΔCT 95% CI
1 GABARAPL1 − 1.1751 (− 1.5688, − 0.7815) 2.2581 (1.7189, 2.9666)
2 ATG16L1 − 0.9175 (− 1.3111, − 0.5239) 1.8888 (1.4379, 2.4813)
3 GABARAPL2 − 0.9128 (− 1.1513, − 0.6742) 1.8827 (1.5957, 2.2211)
4 MAP1LC3C − 0.9029 (− 1.6795, − 0.1264) 1.8698 (1.0916, 3.2032)
5 ATG10 − 0.8651 (− 1.1210, − 0.6092) 1.8215 (1.5254, 2.1750)
6 GABARAP − 0.7467 (− 0.9653, − 0.5281) 1.6780 (1.4420, 1.9524)
7 MAP1LC3B − 0.7378 (− 0.9945, − 0.4810) 1.6676 (1.3957, 1.9924)
8 ATG12 − 0.6074 (− 0.9147, − 0.3001) 1.5235 (1.2312, 1.8852)
9 ATG4C − 0.5939 (− 1.0017, − 0.1861) 1.5093 (1.1377, 2.0024)
10 ATG5 − 0.4311 (− 0.5961, − 0.2660) 1.3483 (1.2025, 1.5116)
11 ATG4A − 0.3873 (− 0.6409, − 0.1338) 1.3079 (1.0972, 1.5593)
12 MAP1LC3A − 0.3523 (− 0.6398, − 0.0648) 1.2766 (1.0459, 1.5581)
13 ATG3 − 0.2823 (− 0.4308, − 0.1337) 1.2161 (1.0971, 1.3480)
14 ATG4B − 0.2612 (− 0.5318, 0.0094) 1.1985 (0.9935, 1.4457)
15 ATG4D − 0.1932 (− 0.4720, 0.0856) 1.1433 (0.9424, 1.3870)
16 ATG7 − 0.0737 (− 0.2671, 0.1197) 1.0524 (0.9204, 1.2034)