Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 26;46(11):1745–1755. doi: 10.1007/s10439-018-2073-z

Table 1.

The outcomes of the f test and t tests for OCD and CD defect dimension differences in Fig. 7 for each of the imaging methods OCT and IVUS.

Dimension difference Comparison Osteochondral defects (OCD) Chondral defects (CD)
f test
p value
t test
p value
f test
p value
t test
p value
Diameter OCT–µCT vs. IVUS–µCT 0.678 0.591 0.101 0.004
Insertion depth OCT–µCT vs. IVUS–µCT 0.141 0.333 0.547 0.002