Table 2.
Genotype | N | TGW (g) | Area (mm2) | Width (mm) | Length (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bobwhite | 11 | 40.85 ± 0.53 | 15.97 ± 0.14 | 3.53 ± 0.018 | 6.1 ± 0.038 |
AABBDD | 37 | 39.95 ± 0.16 | 15.96 ± 0.08 | 3.54 ± 0.056 | 6.11 ± 0.029 |
aaBBDD | 26 | 41.49 ± 0.46 | 15.99 ± 0.13 | 3.6 ± 0.017 | 6.09 ± 0.032 |
3.85%* | 0.19% | 1.69%* | − 0.33% | ||
AAbbDD | 53 | 41.85 ± 0.37 | 16.25 ± 0.11 | 3.6 ± 0.013 | 6.17 ± 0.032 |
4.76%** | 1.82% | 1.69%** | 0.98% | ||
AABBdd | 28 | 43.15 ± 0.56 | 16.69 ± 0.16 | 3.62 ± 0.017 | 6.34 ± 0.045 |
8.01%**** | 4.57%*** | 2.26%** | 3.76%**** | ||
aabbDD | 7 | 44.58 ± 0.45 | 16.65 ± 0.16 | 3.7 ± 0.022 | 6.04 ± 0.048 |
11.59%*** | 4.32%** | 4.52%*** | − 1.15% | ||
aaBBdd | 16 | 44.36 ± 0.88 | 16.69 ± 0.18 | 3.69 ± 0.022 | 6.16 ± 0.032 |
11.04%**** | 4.57%*** | 4.24%**** | 0.82% | ||
AAbbdd | 30 | 44.79 ± 0.4 | 16.83 ± 0.12 | 3.68 ± 0.016 | 6.21 ± 0.029 |
12.12%**** | 5.45%**** | 3.95%**** | 1.64%** | ||
aabbdd | 37 | 46.33 ± 0.38 | 17.24 ± 0.1 | 3.74 ± 0.013 | 6.28 ± 0.026 |
15.97%**** | 8.02%**** | 5.65%**** | 2.78%**** | ||
ANOVA (P value) | < 2.2e−16 | 2.531e−15 | < 2.2e−16 | 3.175e−08 |
All data are shown as mean ± standard error. The phenotype data of each genotype was compared to that of genotype AABBDD using the two-tailed Student’s t test; *significant at 0.01 < P < 0.05, **significant at 0.001 < P < 0.01, ***significant at 0.0001 < P < 0.001, ****significant at P < 0.0001. There were no phenotypic differences between regenerated plants with genotype AABBDD and wheat cultivar Bobwhite