Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 10;33(11):1049–1062. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0439-z

Table 2.

Poor performance as a predictor of mortality using the eight cognitive measures separately and a combined composite score as measured in the EPIC-Norfolk 3 Cohort (2006–2010), including pilot data (2004–2006) and followed up over average of 7.1 years, after adjustment for covariates

Rangea N Freq Mort.% (n) Model 1 N Model 2 n/N Model 3
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
SF-EMSE 8483 8402 795 /8273
 Good 32, 37 6178 8.0 (492) 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Poor 0, 31 2305 14.6 (337) 1.21 1.05, 1.39 0.01 1.22 1.05, 1.41 0.01 1.17 1.01, 1.36 0.05
P < 0.001
HVLT 8139 8063 735 /7944
 Good 22, 36 6102 7.5 (456) 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Poor 0, 21 2037 15.1(308) 1.21 1.04, 1.41 0.01 1.21 1.03, 1.41 0.02 1.19 1.01, 1.40 0.03
P < 0.001
PAL-FTMS 7461 7390 685 /7273
 Good 14, 26 5387 7.7 (416) 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Poor 0, 13 2074 14.3 (296) 1.16 1.00, 1.36 0.05 1.16 1.00, 1.36 0.06 1.18 1.01, 1.38 0.04
P < 0.001
PW-acc 8410 8331 778 /8205
 Good 10, 54 6073 7.5 (457) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Poor − 31, 9 2337 15.0 (351) 1.31 1.14, 1.52 P < 0.001 1.32 1.14, 1.53 P < 0.001 1.33 1.15, 1.54 P < 0.001
P < 0.001
7144 7074 613 /6963
VST-simple
 Good 453.1, 694.0 5356 7.7 (415) 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Poor 694.1, 4078.3 1788 12.4 (222) 1.25 1.06, 1.48 0.01 1.23 1.04, 1.46 0.02 1.22 1.03, 1.45 0.02
P < 0.001
VST-complex 7144 7074 613 / 6963
 Good 458.8, 7291.1 5358 7.3 (390) 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Poor 849.2, 11825.8 1786 13.8 (247) 1.28 1.08, 1.50 0.004 1.28 1.08, 1.51 0.003 1.26 1.07, 1.50 0.01
P < 0.001
Sh-NART 8112 8030 718 /7907
 Good 0, 24 6277 9.1 (573) 1.00 1.00 0.85, 1.29 1.00
 Poor 25, 50 1835 9.6 (176) 0.98 0.82, 1.16 0.8 0.97 0.81, 1.16 0.7 0.97 0.80, 1.17 0.7
P = 0.6
Pros. mem 8403 8324 784 /8199
Success 6827 8.3 (567) 1.00 1.00 1.00
Failure 1576 15.6 (246) 1.25 1.08, 1.46 0.004 1.25 1.07, 1.46 0.01 1.27 1.08, 1.49 0.003
P < 0.001
EPIC-COGCompb 6128 6067 504/ 5971
 Good 6, 8 4237 6.3 (267) 1.00 1.00 1.00
 Poor 0, 5 1891 13.5 (255) 1.27 1.06, 1.53 0.01 1.26 1.04, 1.52 0.02 1.31 1.09, 1.60 0.01
P < 0.001

Models 1 adjusted for age and sex; Models 2 adjusted for age, sex, education and social class; Models 3 adjusted for age, sex, education and social class, smoking, body mass index (bmi), physical activity and prevalent disease

CI confidence interval, EPIC-COGComp composite score (a summary score based on the performance group using data from all eight cognition test outcomes); 1, Freq frequency, HVLT hopkins verbal learning test, Mort. mortality, N number in the analyses, n number of deaths, PAL-FTMS paired associated learning, first trial memory score, Pros. Mem prospective memory, PW-Acc PW-accuracy, SF-EMSE short form extended mental state exam, Sh-NART short national adult reading test, VST visual sensitivity test

aRange of score (or in case of VST, reaction time in ms). bThe composite score is based on combining all the individual cognitive tests, so number in the final analysis (model 3) is significantly smaller than the other tests. See Supplementary information on the summary score