Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;88(6):675–683. doi: 10.2319/070118-491.1

Table 4.

Relationship Between Primary Treatments and Practice Demographicsa


Aligners Often
Extract Often
TADS Often
Jaw Surgery Often
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
Practice type
 Solo, private practice (n = 48) 18 37 10 21 5 10 5 10
 Owner, nonsolo, private practice (n = 18) 4 22 2 11 1 6 1 6
 Associate/employee private practice (n = 9) 4 44 5 56 0 0 1 11
 Academic setting (n = 11) 3 21 6 55 5 45 3 27
P = .6 P = .01 P = .01 P = .3
Location of primary practice location
 Inner city of urban area (n = 15) 8 53 6 40 5 33 3 20
 Urban (not inner city) (n = 31) 11 35 9 29 2 6 4 13
 Suburban (n = 34) 9 26 10 29 3 9 5 15
 Rural (n = 8) 1 12 1 13 0 0 0 0
P = .4 P = .6 P = .7 P = .6
Network region
 Western (n = 37) 16 43 7 19 5 14 5 14
 Midwest (n = 9) 0 0 2 22 1 11 1 11
 Southwest (n = 16) 7 44 6 38 3 191 2 12
 South Central (n = 6) 1 17 2 33 0 0 2 33
 South Atlantic (n = 9) 2 22 2 33 2 22 2 22
 Northeast (n = 14) 4 29 6 43 0 0 1 7
P = .12 P = .5 P = .5 P = .7
a 

P values from chi-square or Fisher exact test.