Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 25;9:1534. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01534

Table 2.

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) among populations of species and two phylogenetic clusters for Quercus liaotungensis.

Locus Group Source of variation Sum of squares Percentage of variation (%) FST/CT
RPc Species Among populations 9.15 3.08 0.0303∗∗
Within populations 65.60 96.92
Cluster 1 Among populations 6.54 2.89 0.0289 ns
Within populations 48.60 97.11
Cluster 2 Among populations 2.20 3.82 0.0382 ns
Within populations 17.00 96.18
Cluster 1–Cluster 2 Among groups 0.41 0.17 0.0017 ns
Within groups 8.74 3.16
Within populations 65.60 97.01
SAP Species Among populations 6.20 8.98 0.0898∗∗∗
Within populations 29.50 91.02
Cluster 1 Among populations 2.59 5.38 0.0538∗∗
Within populations 15.90 94.62
Cluster 2 Among populations 2.25 7.29 0.0729∗∗
Within populations 13.60 92.71
Cluster 1–Cluster 2 Among groups 1.36 7.23 0.0723∗∗
Within groups 4.84 5.51
Within populations 29.50 87.26
Chloroplast Species Among populations 37.86 100.00 1.0000∗∗∗
Within populations 0.00 0.00
Cluster 1 Among populations 19.00 100.00 1.0000∗∗∗
Within populations 0.00 0.00
Cluster 2 Among populations 10.00 100.00 1.0000∗∗∗
Within populations 0.00 0.00
Cluster 1–Cluster 2 Among groups 8.86 35.91 0.3591∗∗∗
Within groups 29.00 64.09
Within populations 0.00 0.00

∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗P < 0.05; ns, not significant.