Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 20;596(21):5199–5216. doi: 10.1113/JP275672

Figure 7. Modulation of NE‐induced vasoconstriction in normal and DMD dogs by l‐NAME.

Figure 7

A, percentage change of mean vascular conductance (MVC) in response to ACh administration in normal (n = 9) and DMD dogs (n = 14) in the absence and presence of l‐NAME. *Significantly different. B and C, representative tracings of mean arterial pressure (MAP) and blood flow (BF) in response to noradrenaline (NE) administration at rest and during contraction in a normal (B) and a DMD (C) dog in the presence of l‐NAME. D and E, percentage decrease in mean vascular conductance (MVC) in response to NE administration at rest and during contraction in normal (n = 9) and DMD (n = 14) dogs in the presence of l‐NAME. F, efficiency of functional sympatholysis in normal (n = 9) and DMD dogs (n = 14) in the presence of l‐NAME. *Significantly different from the resting condition.