Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;39(41):3727–3735. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy534

Table 2.

Comparative differencesa in calcified plaque measurements among 35 146 asymptomatic women and men with detectable coronary artery calcium (score >0) enrolled in the CAC Consortium

CAC measures CAC 1–100 (n = 19 684)
CAC 101–399 (n = 8612)
CAC ≥400 (n = 6850)
Women (n = 5236) Men (n = 14448) Women (n = 1840) Men (n = 6772) Women (n = 1039) Men (n = 5811) Sex interaction P value
CAC Score 28 ± 28 28 ± 37 204 ± 81 213 ± 85 1025 ± 826 1161 ± 964 <0.0001
Number of calcified vessels 1.5 ± 0.7 1.6 ± 0.8 2.4 ± 0.9 2.6 ± 0.9 3.2 ± 0.7 3.3 ± 0.6 0.008
Number of calcified lesions 2.6 ± 2.4 3.5 ± 3.3 6.9 ± 4.2 9.5 ± 5.9 15.9 ± 9.2 20.2 ± 11.1 <0.0001
CAC volume (mm3) 24 ± 22 25 ± 23 161 ± 66 172 ± 69 790 ± 578 932 ± 772 <0.0001
CAC density (HU) 192 ± 43 184 ± 37 248 ± 43 234 ± 37 268 ± 39 258 ± 36 0.013
Mean lesion size (mm3) 12 ± 11 10 ± 10 36 ± 30 28 ± 20 65 ± 48 57 ± 43 <0.0001

The mean and standard deviation (±) values are reported in each of the cell subgroups. The sex interaction P value is for each of the CAC measures listed in each row of this table.

a

Comparative analysis using general linear model with subsets by sex and Agatston score subgroups. P value is a test for interaction of the Agatston score subgroups by sex. Explanatory variance (or r2) was moderate and ranged from 0.38 to 0.53 for all measures. Non-parametric analysis comparing independent samples provided similar results.