Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 27;15(10):2131. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102131

Table 8.

Correlations of independent variables used in both models.

Associations between Independent Variables and the Dependent Variable 1 for Occupational Safety Culture Associations between Independent Variables and the Dependent Variable 2 for Patient Safety Culture
Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-Tailed) N Pearson Correlation Sig. (2-Tailed) N
COPSOQ Job satisfaction (scale)
0.40 ** 0.000 970 0.54 ** 0.000 971
Adapted from CBI Patient-related burnout (scale)
−0.35 ** 0.000 970 −0.30 ** 0.000 971
TLI short Transformational leadership (scale)
0.21 ** 0.000 940 0.39 ** 0.000 949
TWINS Occupational Safety versus TWINS Patient Safety Supervisor support for occupational safety (scale) Supervisor support for patient safety (scale)
0.23 ** 0.000 940 0.57 ** 0.000 949
Occupational safety-related behaviour of the direct supervisor (factor) Patient safety-related behaviour of the direct supervisor (factor)
0.20 ** 0.000 940 0.45 ** 0.000 949
Occupational safety-related behaviour of the hospital management (factor) Patient safety-related behaviour of the hospital management (factor)
0.24 ** 0.000 940 0.55 ** 0.000 949
Individual influence on how well occupational safety is implemented at the workplace (single item) Individual influence on how well patient safety is implemented at the workplace (single item)
0.21 ** 0.000 940 0.46 ** 0.000 949

1 Dependent variable: personal perception of the frequency of occupational risks (index). 2 Dependent variable: perceived patient safety (factor). ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).