Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 10;7(10):340. doi: 10.3390/jcm7100340

Table 2.

Associations among surrogate measures of muscle quality and body composition estimates.

Echogenicity a IMAT b Subcutaneous Fat b Total Body Fat c Lean Body Mass d
Echogenicity a r 1 0.73 0.47 0.51 −0.29
p-value <0.001 * 0.008 * 0.004 * 0.126
IMAT b r 1 0.38 0.54 0.03
p-value 0.038 * 0.002 * 0.882
Subcutaneous fat b r 1 0.62 * 0.11
p-value <0.001 0.553
Total body fat c r 1 0.18
p-value 0.328
Lean body mass d r 1
p-value

IMAT, intra- and intermuscular adipose tissue; Adj., adjusted; Ext., extensors; * p < 0.05. a Echogenicity obtained from the rectus femoris of the dominant limb and measured via grayscale histogram analysis. b IMAT and subcutaneous fat values derived from computed tomography attenuation at the mid-thigh of the dominant limb; log transformed data used in the analysis. c Total body fat estimated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). d Lean body mass is appendicular lean mass scaled to height (aLM/ht2).