Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 10;7(10):340. doi: 10.3390/jcm7100340

Table 4.

Associations between measures of muscle quality, physical performance and mobility.

Grip Adj. Grip 60°/s Knee Ext. Adj. 60°/s Knee Ext. 180°/s Knee Ext. Adj. 180°/s Knee Ext.
Echogenicity a r −0.41 −0.50 −0.38 −0.47 −0.41 −0.49
p-value 0.026 * 0.005 * 0.038 * 0.008 * 0.025 * 0.006 *
IMAT b r −0.13 −0.45 −0.14 −0.34 −0.21 −0.40
p-value 0.496 0.013 * 0.476 0.069 0.275 0.029 *
Subcutaneous fat b r 0.12 −0.16 0.14 −0.02 0.06 −0.10
p-value 0.519 0.388 0.451 0.909 0.760 0.612
Total body fat c r 0.05 −0.31 0.20 −0.02 0.12 −0.07
p-value 0.809 0.091 0.285 0.921 0.527 0.709
Lean body mass d r 0.50 0.00 0.53 0.24 0.49 0.21
p-value 0.005 * 0.992 0.002 * 0.198 0.006 * 0.274

1 All strength values reported for the dominant limb with the adjusted values scaled for body weight; * p < 0.05. IMAT, intra- and intermuscular adipose tissue; Adj., adjusted; Ext., extensors. a Echogenicity obtained from the rectus femoris of the dominant limb and measured via grayscale histogram analysis. b IMAT and subcutaneous fat values derived from computed tomography attenuation at the mid-thigh of the dominant limb; log transformed data used in the analysis. c Total body fat estimated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). d Lean body mass is appendicular lean mass scaled to height (aLM/ht2).