Table 1.
Study Location | Author(s) and Year | Source of Rice | Type of Arsenic Measured | Mean (mg/kg) ± SD (Range) |
---|---|---|---|---|
USA | He et al. 2010 [23] | Samples purchased in New York | Total As | 0.14 ± 0.0050 |
Japan | Narukawa et al. 2012 [24] | 20 samples from all over Japan | iAs | 0.10 (0.056–0.20) |
Bangladesh, China, USA | Norton et al. 2012 [25] | 6 field trials | Total As | Faridpur: 0.44 (0.19–0.90) Qiyang: 0.68 (0.36–1.27) Arkansas (2006): 0.38 (0.10–0.99) Arkansas (2007): 0.25 (0.030–1.040) Texas (flooded): 0.63 (0.17–1.68) Texas (non-flooded): 0.045 (0.0090–0.13) |
China | Sun et al. 2012 [26] | 2 samples from market in Guangzhou and rice field in Hunan Province | iAs | 0.35 ± 0.0060 (0.40–0.29) |
China | Dai et al. 2014 [27] | 108 samples from local markets | iAs | Jiangsu: 0.063 Jiangxi: 0.057 Zhejiang: 0.059 Mean of all: 0.059 Range of all: (0.027–0.098) |
China | Fang et al. 2014 [18] | 92 samples from fields of main rice-growing provinces | Total As |
Northern China 0.050 ± 0.040 (* ND–0.13) Southern China 0.11 ± 0.050 (* ND–0.14) |
Bangladesh | Ahmed et al. 2016 [21] | 10 market samples | Total As | 0.32 ± 0.16 (0.14–0.43) |
China | Chen et al. 2018 [20] | 160 samples from local markets in 20 provinces | iAs | 0.054 (0.0090–0.13) |
* ND = not detectable.