Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Dec 1;79(4):453–457. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001837

Table 1:

Descriptive demographic information, percent in demographic groups aware of PrEP, and unadjusted and adjusted results of logistic regression models predicting PrEP awareness (n = 636).

Dichotomous variables n (%) n (%) PrEP aware Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Age
 14 − 16 258 (40.6) 38 (14.7) REF -
 17 − 18 378 (59.4) 66 (17.5) 1.23 (0.79 − 1.89) -
Sexual Orientation
 Gay/Homosexual 452 (71.1) 83 (18.4) REF REF
 Bisexual 184 (28.9) 21 (11.4) * 0.57 (0.34 − 0.96) * 0.54 (0.32 − 0.92) *
Race/Ethnicity
 White/Caucasion 343 (53.9) 59 (17.2) REF -
 Black/African American 88 (13.8) 11 (12.5) 0.69 (0.34 − 1.37) -
 Latino/Hispanic 86 (13.5) 13 (15.1) 0.86 (0.45 − 1.65) -
 Other 119 (18.7) 21 (17.6) 1.03 (0.60 − 1.79) -
Sexually active
 Not Active 261 (41.6) 40 (15.3) REF -
 Active 367 (58.4) 63 (17.2) 1.15 (0.74 − 1.76) -
Continuous variables Mean ±SD
Subjective social status 5.84 ±1.64 - 1.13 (0.99 − 1.29) 1.12 (0.98 − 1.28)
Frequency HIV communication 0.80 ±0.98 - 1.29 (1.06 − 1.57) * 1.45 (1.12 − 1.89) *
Quality HIV communication 1.90 ±1.20 - 1.03 (0.87 − 1.23) 0.83 (0.66 − 1.05)

Note:

p < 0.10

* p < 0.05;

PrEP: pre-exposure prophylaxis; OR: odds ratio; REF: reference group.