Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;69:409–435. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011725

Table 3.

Summary of values affirmation interventions in higher education

Study Problem Context and sample Intervention Primary findings
Values affirmation interventions
Course specific
Miyake et al.
 (2010)
Gender gap in
 physics
Two sections of
 introductory physics for
 STEM majors at a public
 university (n = 399)
Values affirmation:
 students wrote about their
 most important values,
 once as an in-class practice
 writing exercise and once
 as an online homework
 assignment
Increased performance for
 women on course exams
 and a standardized physics
 test
Harackiewicz
 et al. (2014a)a
Social class
 achievement
 gap in biology
Three sections of
 introductory biology for
 STEM majors at a public
 university (n = 798)
Values affirmation: twice
 during the semester,
 students wrote about their
 most important values as
 an in-class practice writing
 exercise
Increased course
 performance, enrollment
 in another biology course,
 and overall semester GPAs
 for first-generation college
 students
Harackiewicz
 et al. (2016a)b
Social class
 achievement
 gap in biology
Eight sections of
 introductory biology for
 STEM majors at a public
 university (n = 1,040)
Values affirmation: twice
 during the semester,
 students wrote about their
 most important values as
 an in-class practice writing
 exercise
Utility value: see Table 1
No effect
College general
Layous et al.
 (2017)
Promoting
 performance for
 students with
 low belonging
First- and second-year
 undergraduates at a public
 university; activities
 completed in small groups
 in a laboratory setting
 (n = 105)
Values affirmation:
 students ranked a list of
 values and wrote about
 their most important value
Increased overall GPAs for
 all students and
 particularly for students
 with low sense of
 belonging and for men
Brady et al.
 (2016)
Racial
 achievement
 gap for Latino
 students
First- and second-year
 undergraduates; activities
 completed in a laboratory
 setting
Follow-up two years later
 (n = 183)
Values affirmation:
 students ranked a list of
 values and wrote about
 their most important value
Increased postintervention
 GPAs for Latino students;
 decreased postintervention
 GPAs for White students
Tibbetts et al.
 (2016a)
Social class
 achievement
 gap
Three-year follow-up of an
 intervention completed in
 three sections of
 introductory biology for
 STEM majors at a public
 university (n = 788)
Values affirmation: twice
 during the semester,
 students wrote about their
 most important values as
 an in-class practice writing
 exercise
Increased postintervention
 GPAs for first-generation
 college students
a

Measured a combination of course-specific, field-specific, and college-general outcomes.

b

Tested interventions from two different categories.

Abbreviation: STEM, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.