Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2018 Jul 12;7(1):e00807-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00807-18

Genome Sequences of Eight Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Strains Isolated from a Produce-Growing Region in California

Craig T Parker a,, Kerry K Cooper b, Steven Huynh a, Timothy P Smith c, James L Bono c, Michael Cooley a
Editor: Frank J Stewartd
PMCID: PMC6211345  PMID: 30533611

Produce contaminated with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is a continuing source of foodborne illness in the United States. This report documents the complete genome sequences of eight STEC strains isolated from livestock and water samples taken from a major agricultural region for leafy greens in California.

ABSTRACT

Produce contaminated with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) is a continuing source of foodborne illness in the United States. This report documents the complete genome sequences of eight STEC strains isolated from livestock and water samples taken from a major agricultural region for leafy greens in California.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Cases of foodborne illness due to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) are a global problem, with approximately 2.8 million cases of acute illness annually (1). Although STEC O157:H7 strains are the cause of the majority of these illnesses, non-O157 STEC infections have emerged as a public health problem in the United States and internationally (24). The presence of STEC adjacent to a raw produce production environment must be considered a risk factor for contamination, with several transmission routes possible, including water, air, and animals (59). Indeed, raw produce has been the source of multiple outbreaks involving a variety of identified serotypes, including O157, O145, and O104 STEC (1014). This announcement documents the complete genome sequences of eight non-O157 STEC strains previously isolated from livestock and water samples collected in a major agricultural region for leafy greens production on California’s Central Coast (15).

The STEC cultures were grown overnight on LB agar plates at 37°C, and genomic DNA was extracted using sucrose-Tris with phenol-chloroform cleanup extractions as described previously (16). Sequencing was performed using a Pacific Biosciences (PacBio, Menlo Park, CA) RS II platform with 20-kb SMRTbell libraries as described previously (17). Briefly, SMRTbell libraries were prepared from 10 μg of bacterial genomic DNA with G-tube (Covaris, Woburn, MA) fragmentation using the described PacBio procedure (18) but with 1× AMPure cleanup and DNA repair after 10-kb size selection using BluePippin. Single-molecule real-time (SMRT) cells were run with the 0.1 nM on-plate concentration, P6/C4 sequencing chemistry, MagBead One Cell Per Well v1 collection protocol, and 360-min data collection mode. The PacBio reads were assembled using the hierarchical genome assembly process (HGAP) v3.0 in SMRT Analysis v2.3.0 (PacBio). The chromosomes and plasmids for each STEC strain were circularized from one contig with overlapping ends. All strains were sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq platform and the KAPA LTP library preparation kit (KAPA Biosystems, Wilmington, MA). The pooled libraries were loaded into a MiSeq system and sequenced using a MiSeq reagent kit v2 with 2 × 250 cycles (Illumina, Inc.). A final base call validation of the PacBio contigs was performed using MiSeq reads trimmed using a quality score threshold of 20 or higher (≥Q20) and the reference assembler within Geneious software v11.1 (Biomatters, Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand). The final coverage for each strain was >200×. Protein-, rRNA-, and tRNA-coding genes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genomes Automatic Annotation Pipeline (PGAAP) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/static/Pipeline.html).

The accession numbers, serotypes, and assembly metrics for each complete genome are listed in Table 1. Seven serotypes are represented among these agriculturally relevant STEC genomes, including the first complete STEC O43 genome (strain RM10042) based on BLAST analysis. Features from these STEC genomes include one to three stx-containing prophages per chromosome. It should be noted that not all genomes possess the locus for enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island. The sequencing data of these STEC strains will add to our understanding of STEC genome organization, phylogeny, and references for outbreak traceback analyses.

TABLE 1.

Accession numbers and genome metrics of 8 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli strains from a produce-growing region in California

Strain name Serotype Chromosomal GenBank
accession no.
No. of stx
phages
LEE
region
Chromosome
size (bp)
Plasmid size (bp)
(GenBank accession no.)
RM8426 O26:H11 CP028116 1 Yes 5,648,177 90,123 (CP028115)
RM10386 O26:H11 CP028126 2 Yes 5,785,882 83,012 (CP028124)
98,899 (CP028125)
RM10042 O43:H2 CP028122 2 No 5,057,506 8,120 (CP028123)
86,617 (CP028120)
109,466 (CP028121)
RM8385 O103:H11 CP028112 1 Yes 5,631,913 6,673 (CP028114)
94,220 (CP028113)
RM9322 O111:H8 CP028117 1 Yes 5,198,840 7,072 (CP028119)
78,469 (CP028118)
RM10466 O113:H21 CP028381 3 No 5,044,460 67,750 (CP028383)
160,675 (CP028382)
RM8352 O121:H19 CP028110 1 Yes 5,391,064 83,211 (CP028111)
RM9872 O145:H28 CP028379 1 Yes 5,385,924 89,518 (CP028380)

Data availability.

The whole-genome sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service CRIS projects 2030-42000-051-00D and 2030-42000-050-00D.

We thank Robert Mandrell, Anne Bates, and Mary Chapman for the curation of the Produce Safety and Microbiology Research Unit bacterial strain collection.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Majowicz SE, Scallan E, Jones-Bitton A, Sargeant JM, Stapleton J, Angulo FJ, Yeung DH, Kirk MD. 2014. Global incidence of human Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections and deaths: a systematic review and knowledge synthesis. Foodborne Pathog Dis 11:447–455. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2013.1704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Batz MB, Hoffmann S, Morris JG Jr. 2012. Ranking the disease burden of 14 pathogens in food sources in the United States using attribution data from outbreak investigations and expert elicitation. J Food Prot 75:1278–1291. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bettelheim KA. 2007. The non-O157 Shiga-toxigenic (verocytotoxigenic) Escherichia coli; under-rated pathogens. Crit Rev Microbiol 33:67–87. doi: 10.1080/10408410601172172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brooks JT, Sowers EG, Wells JG, Greene KD, Griffin PM, Hoekstra RM, Strockbine NA. 2005. Non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in the United States, 1983–2002. J Infect Dis 192:1422–1429. doi: 10.1086/466536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pohlenz TD, Zavadilova K, Ghosh A, Zurek L. 2018. Prevalence of Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli in house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in an urban environment. J Med Entomol 55:436–439. doi: 10.1093/jme/tjx225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alam MJ, Zurek L. 2004. Association of Escherichia coli O157:H7 with houseflies on a cattle farm. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:7578–7580. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7578-7580.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Berry ED, Wells JE, Bono JL, Woodbury BL, Kalchayanand N, Norman KN, Suslow TV, Lopez-Velasco G, Millner PD. 2015. Effect of proximity to a cattle feedlot on Escherichia coli O157:H7 contamination of leafy greens and evaluation of the potential for airborne transmission. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1101–1110. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02998-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Benjamin L, Atwill ER, Jay-Russell M, Cooley M, Carychao D, Gorski L, Mandrell RE. 2013. Occurrence of generic Escherichia coli, E. coli O157 and Salmonella spp. in water and sediment from leafy green produce farms and streams on the Central California coast. Int J Food Microbiol 165:65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jay MT, Cooley M, Carychao D, Wiscomb GW, Sweitzer RA, Crawford-Miksza L, Farrar JA, Lau DK, O’Connell J, Millington A, Asmundson RV, Atwill ER, Mandrell RE. 2007. Escherichia coli O157:H7 in feral swine near spinach fields and cattle, Central California coast. Emerg Infect Dis 13:1908–1911. doi: 10.3201/eid1312.070763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.FDA. 2010. Federal and state officials confirm link between bagged Romaine lettuce and E. coli O145 illness outbreak. https://www.foodsafety.gov/news/educators/ednetmay2010.html#_Federal_and_State.
  • 11.Askar M, Faber MS, Frank C, Bernard H, Gilsdorf A, Fruth A, Prager R, Höhle M, Suess T, Wadl M, Krause G, Stark K, Werber D; HUS Investigation Team. 2011. Large and ongoing outbreak of haemolytic uraemic syndrome, Germany, May 2011. Euro Surveill 16:19883 https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/ese.16.21.19878-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2018. Multistate outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infections linked to romaine lettuce. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA: https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2018/o157h7-04-18/index.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2006. Ongoing multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 infections associated with consumption of fresh spinach–United States, September 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 55:1045–1046. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2017. Multistate outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections linked to leafy greens (final update). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA: https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2017/o157h7-12-17/index.html. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cooley MB, Jay-Russell M, Atwill ER, Carychao D, Nguyen K, Quiñones B, Patel R, Walker S, Swimley M, Pierre-Jerome E, Gordus AG, Mandrell RE. 2013. Development of a robust method for isolation of Shiga toxin-positive Escherichia coli (STEC) from fecal, plant, soil and water samples from a leafy greens production region in California. PLoS One 8:e65716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miller WG, On SLW, Wang G, Fontanoz S, Lastovica AJ, Mandrell RE. 2005. Extended multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. helveticus. J Clin Microbiol 43:2315–2329. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2315-2329.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Miller WG, Yee E, Chapman MH, Smith TPL, Bono JL, Huynh S, Parker CT, Vandamme P, Luong K, Korlach J. 2014. Comparative genomics of the Campylobacter lari group. Genome Biol Evol 6:3252–3266. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.PacBio. 2015. Procedure and checklist: 20 kb template preparation using BluePippin size-selection system. https://www.pacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Procedure-Checklist-20-kb-Template-Preparation-Using-BluePippin-Size-Selection.pdf.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers listed in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES