Table 3.
Description of Decision Rules for Rejecting Abiotic Hypotheses (Criterion #8)
| Rule | Description |
|---|---|
| A | Evidence for Darwinian evolution precludes an abiotic origin even in the absence of any other feature. |
| B | Evidence for a spectral signature of pigments precludes an abiotic origin even in the absence of any other feature. |
| C | Evidence for DNA or RNA precludes an abiotic origin even in the absence of any other feature. |
| D | Evidence for both cell-like features and structural preferences in organics (nonrandom and enhancing function, such as a repeating charge or chirality) precludes an abiotic origin. |
| E | Evidence for both cell-like features and patterns of complexity in organics precludes an abiotic origin. |
| F | Evidence for both a response to stimulation and structural preferences in organics precludes an abiotic origin. |
| G | Evidence for both a response to stimulation and patterns of complexity in organics precludes an abiotic origin. |
| H | Evidence for both structural preferences and patterns of complexity in organics precludes an abiotic origin. |
| I | Without evidence for structural preferences in organics, and unless one of the above rules applies, an abiotic origin cannot be precluded. |
| J | Without evidence for patterns of complexity in organics, and unless one of the above rules applies, an abiotic origin cannot be precluded. |
| K | Without evidence for either structural preferences or patterns of complexity in organics, an abiotic origin cannot be precluded, regardless of whether there is evidence for cell-like morphologies or a response to stimulation. |