Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 13;18(11):1375–1402. doi: 10.1089/ast.2017.1773

Table 3.

Description of Decision Rules for Rejecting Abiotic Hypotheses (Criterion #8)

Rule Description
A Evidence for Darwinian evolution precludes an abiotic origin even in the absence of any other feature.
B Evidence for a spectral signature of pigments precludes an abiotic origin even in the absence of any other feature.
C Evidence for DNA or RNA precludes an abiotic origin even in the absence of any other feature.
D Evidence for both cell-like features and structural preferences in organics (nonrandom and enhancing function, such as a repeating charge or chirality) precludes an abiotic origin.
E Evidence for both cell-like features and patterns of complexity in organics precludes an abiotic origin.
F Evidence for both a response to stimulation and structural preferences in organics precludes an abiotic origin.
G Evidence for both a response to stimulation and patterns of complexity in organics precludes an abiotic origin.
H Evidence for both structural preferences and patterns of complexity in organics precludes an abiotic origin.
I Without evidence for structural preferences in organics, and unless one of the above rules applies, an abiotic origin cannot be precluded.
J Without evidence for patterns of complexity in organics, and unless one of the above rules applies, an abiotic origin cannot be precluded.
K Without evidence for either structural preferences or patterns of complexity in organics, an abiotic origin cannot be precluded, regardless of whether there is evidence for cell-like morphologies or a response to stimulation.