Table 3.
Description of Decision Rules for Rejecting Abiotic Hypotheses (Criterion #8)
Rule | Description |
---|---|
A | Evidence for Darwinian evolution precludes an abiotic origin even in the absence of any other feature. |
B | Evidence for a spectral signature of pigments precludes an abiotic origin even in the absence of any other feature. |
C | Evidence for DNA or RNA precludes an abiotic origin even in the absence of any other feature. |
D | Evidence for both cell-like features and structural preferences in organics (nonrandom and enhancing function, such as a repeating charge or chirality) precludes an abiotic origin. |
E | Evidence for both cell-like features and patterns of complexity in organics precludes an abiotic origin. |
F | Evidence for both a response to stimulation and structural preferences in organics precludes an abiotic origin. |
G | Evidence for both a response to stimulation and patterns of complexity in organics precludes an abiotic origin. |
H | Evidence for both structural preferences and patterns of complexity in organics precludes an abiotic origin. |
I | Without evidence for structural preferences in organics, and unless one of the above rules applies, an abiotic origin cannot be precluded. |
J | Without evidence for patterns of complexity in organics, and unless one of the above rules applies, an abiotic origin cannot be precluded. |
K | Without evidence for either structural preferences or patterns of complexity in organics, an abiotic origin cannot be precluded, regardless of whether there is evidence for cell-like morphologies or a response to stimulation. |