Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 1;10:135. doi: 10.1186/s13148-018-0557-1

Table 1.

Summary of significant CpG markers among the comparisons

Comparison # all markers # hyper markers # hypo markers
KD1 vs. HC 12,209 1484 10,725
KD3 vs. HC 13,936 505 13,431
KD3 vs. KD1 14,643 4669 9974

Based on the criteria of an FDR < 0.05 and variation ratio > 1.1, we identified significant CpG markers among the three comparisons. Hyper marker and hypo marker denoted the significant hyper-methylated and hypo-methylated markers, respectively