Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;8(2):020803. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020803

Table 3.

Coverage estimates for antenatal care (N = 392)

At least 1 ANC
At least 4 ANC

%
95% CI
Absolute difference
Relative difference
%
95% CI
Absolute difference
Relative difference
Antenatal care attendance (not adjusted for service quality)
81.9
71.3-89.2


31.9
24.6-40.1


Structure-adjusted coverage – exact match method
Exact match
30.9
27.1-34.8
REF
REF
12.1
8.9-15.3
REF
REF
Structure-adjusted coverage – aggregate methods
Aggregate by district unweighted
28.4*
25.7-31.1
-2.5
-8.1%
10.8
8.3-13.3
-1.3
-10.7%
Aggregate by district weighted
34.2*
30.8-37.6
3.3
10.7%
13.2
10.0-16.3
1.1
9.1%
10 km buffer unweighted
28.1
24.2-32.0
-2.8
-9.1%
10.8
8.2-13.4
-1.3
-10.7%
10 km buffer weighted
30.6
26.4-34.7
-0.3
-1.0%
12.0
9.1-15.0
-0.1
-0.8%
Structure-adjusted coverage – single-facility methods
Nearest facility (straight line)
29.6
24.9-34.2
-1.3
-4.2%
11.7
8.2-15.1
-0.4
-3.3%
Nearest facility (road distance) 28.1* 23.8-32.4 -2.8 -9.1% 10.8 8.0-13.6 -1.3 -10.7%

ANC – antenatal care, CI – confidence interval

*Exact-match and ecological estimates are significantly different at the P < 0.05 level.