Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;8(2):020803. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020803

Table 8.

Coverage estimates for sick child care (N = 183)

% 95% CI Absolute difference Relative difference % 95% CI Absolute difference Relative difference
Care-seeking from a skilled provider for fever, diarrhea, or signs of acute respiratory infection (not adjusted for service quality)
43.2
35.7-60.0







Structure-adjusted coverage
Process-adjusted coverage
Linked coverage estimates – exact match method
Exact match
22.9
18.2-27.5
REF
REF
16.8
12.8-20.8
REF
REF
Linked coverage estimates – aggregate methods
Aggregate by district (unweighted)
17.8*
14.6-21.0
-5.1
-22.3%
21.0*
17.2-24.8
4.2
25.0%
Aggregate by district (weighted)
19.7*
16.1-23.2
-3.2
-14.0%
21.2*
17.4-25.0
4.4
26.2%
Aggregate by district and provider category (unweighted)
20.3*
15.8-24.8
-2.6
-11.4%
17.4
13.3-21.4
0.6
3.6%
Aggregate by district and provider category (weighted)
21.1*
16.4-25.8
-1.8
-7.9%
17.1
13.1-21.2
0.3
1.8%
10 km buffer (unweighted)
18.8*
14.9-22.7
-4.1
-17.9%
15.7
12.4-19.1
-1.1
-6.5%
10 km buffer (weighted)
19.1*
15.1-23.0
-3.8
-16.6%
15.6
12.1-19.1
-1.2
-7.1%
Linked coverage estimates – single-facility methods
Nearest facility (straight line)
18.2*
12.3-24.1
-4.7
-20.5%
14.3
9.1-19.6
-2.5
-14.9%
Nearest facility (straight line) by provider category
20.8*
16.1-25.4
-2.1
-9.2%
16.5
12.2-20.7
-0.3
-1.8%
Nearest facility (road distance)
16.0*
10.9-21.1
-6.9
-30.1%
13.8
8.5-19.1
-3
-17.9%
Nearest facility (road distance) by provider category 20.2* 16.0-24.4 -2.7 -11.8% 16.5 12.3-21.8 -0.3 -1.8%

CI – confidence interval

*Exact-match and ecological estimates are significantly different at the P < 0.05 level.