Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206490

Table 2. Odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of obesity according to dietary diversity score in the FiLWHEL.

Dietary Diversity Score
Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3 P-trend
Median 4.00 6.00 8.00
Abdominal Obesity1 (WC≥80cm)
    No. of participants 144 92 164
        No. of cases 70 42 58
Crude Model2 1.00 0.89 (0.53–1.50) 0.58 (0.37–0.91) 0.03
Model 1 1.00 0.88 (0.51–1.52) 0.53 (0.32–0.86) 0.02
Model 2 1.00 0.87 (0.51–1.51) 0.52 (0.32–0.86) 0.02
Model 3 1.00 0.85 (0.49–1.47) 0.49 (0.30–0.82) 0.009
General obesity1 (BMI≥25kg/m2)
    No. of participants 146 92 164
        No. of cases 51 29 40
Crude Model2 1.00 0.86 (0.49–1.50) 0.60 (0.37–0.98) 0.05
Model 1 1.00 0.83 (0.47–1.45) 0.53 (0.32–0.89) 0.02
Model 2 1.00 0.79 (0.45–1.40) 0.51 (0.30–0.86) 0.02
Model 3 1.00 0.75 (0.42–1.35) 0.47 (0.28–0.81) 0.008

Abbreviations: FiLWHEL, Filipino Women’s Diet and Health Study; WC, waist circumference.

1 Used the Asia-pacific criteria [19].

2 We did not adjust for any variables.

Model 1: Adjusted for age (continuous, years) and total energy intake (continuous, kcal/day). Model 2: Adjusted for covariates in the Model 1 + years of stay in Korea (0–4 years, 5–9 years, 10+ years), place of residence (urban, rural), and employment (employed, non-employed). Model 3: Adjusted for covariates in the Model 2 + parity (no children, one child, two children, three or more children), and history of breastfeeding (continuous, months).