Skip to main content
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology logoLink to Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
. 2018 Nov 2;9(10):201. doi: 10.1038/s41424-018-0064-x

Clinical Heterogeneity of Immune Dysregulation, Polyendocrinopathy, Enteropathy, X-Linked Syndrome: A French Multicenter Retrospective Study

R Duclaux-Loras 1,2,3,, F Charbit-Henrion 2,3,4, B Neven 2,5, J Nowak 6, S Collardeau-Frachon 7, C Malcus 8, P F Ray 9,10, D Moshous 2,5, J Beltrand 11, O Goulet 2,3,4, N Cerf-Bensussan 2,3, A Lachaux 1, F Rieux-Laucat 2,12, F M Ruemmele 2,3,4
PMCID: PMC6212456  PMID: 30385752

Abstract

Objective

Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome is an autoimmune disease caused by mutations in the forkhead box protein 3 gene (FOXP3), which encodes a key regulator of immune tolerance. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical heterogeneity of the disease in a national French cohort.

Methods

Multicenter retrospective study of patients diagnosed with IPEX syndrome caused by mutations in FOXP3.

Results

Thirty children from 26 families were included. Age at disease onset (median [first to third quartile]) was 1.5 mo [0–84] and at death 3.5 years [0–10.5] (n = 15) indicating a high heterogeneity. Initial presentation was diarrhoea (68%), type 1 diabetes (T1D; 25%), skin lesions (7%) and nephropathy (3%). During the course of the disease the following main symptoms were observed: diarrhoea (100%), skin lesions (85%), T1DM (50%), severe food allergies (39%), haematological disorders (28%), nephropathies (25%), hepatitis (14%) as well as the presence of a variety of autoantibodies. Immunosuppressive mono- or combination therapy led to improvement in eight children. Three boys displayed a stable disease course without any immunosuppressive medication. Overall 10-year survival rate was 43% (42% in transplanted patients and 52% in patients on immunosuppressive therapy). Five out of 22 identified FOXP3 mutations have not been described yet: c.−23 + 1G > A, c.−23 + 5G > A, c.264delC, c.1015C > T and c.1091A > G. The first two produced atypical, attenuated phenotypes. Missense and frameshift mutations affecting the forkhead domain were associated with poor survival (Gehan–Wilcoxon p = 0.002).

Conclusion

The broad phenotypic heterogeneity of IPEX raises questions about modifying factors and justifies early FOXP3 sequencing in suspected cases.

Introduction

Immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) is a rare monogenic primary immunodeficiency caused by mutations in forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3) gene. In 1982, Powell et al.1 reported a large kindred with 19 affected males across 5 generations presenting diarrhoea, which was lethal in most infants in early childhood. In 2001, Chatila et al.2 identified mutations in FOXP3 [initially called JM2 in the centromeric region of the X chromosome (Xq11.3-q13.3)] in two unrelated families with IPEX phenotype. In mice, the so-called “scurfy mutation” which arose spontaneously in Foxp3 and triggered a lymphoproliferative disease with multiorgan inflammation, has corroborated the causative role of FOXP3 in driving the disease3. The FOXP3 gene is highly conserved across mammals and encodes a key transcription factor required for regulatory T cells (Tregs) development, maintenance and function4.

To date, approximately 150 patients carrying mutations in FOXP3 gene have been reported. Classically, IPEX patients present multiorgan autoimmunity, including severe enteropathy, type 1 diabetes (T1D) and dermatitis. Outcome of patients is generally poor, unless successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be proposed.

In the present retrospective multicentre French study of patients carrying FOXP3 mutations, we aim to highlight the broad spectrum of symptoms in order to facilitate diagnosis as well as clinical management of this rare disease.

Patients and Methods

Patients

This multicentre retrospective study reviewed all IPEX patients treated at four French university hospitals between 1980 and 2015 (Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital—Paris, Lyon, Clermont-Ferrand and Bordeaux). Only patients with a documented mutation in the FOXP3 gene were included. Recorded data comprised: age at onset, clinical symptoms (enteropathy, skin disease, endocrinopathy and allergy) and biological parameters (total IgE, autoimmune enteropathy-related—AIE75 kDa autoantibodies), endoscopic and histopathologic presentation, main therapeutics and long-term outcomes.

Methods

Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France). Eleven exons, including all intron–exon boundaries, were amplified from genomic DNA by means of PCR with specific intron-flanking primer pairs. Patients 1–20 and patient 30 were diagnosed at Necker Enfants-Malades Hospital in Paris and patient 21–29 were diagnosed in the university hospital in Grenoble as already described5.

For flow cytometry determination of Tregs, PBMCs were membrane stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies and then fixed, permeabilized, and stained with Alexa Fluor 488 anti-human FOXP3 monoclonal antibodies (used for patients 2, 4, 8, 14, 25 and 26) or allophycocyanin-labelled anti-human FOXP3 as described by Moes et al.6.

Consequences of mutations on protein function were predicted using three algorithms: Polyphen2, Sift (Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant, J. Craig Venter Institute) and Mutation Taster (www.mutationtaster.org). Mutations were next ranked on the basis of the predicted impact of each variant by combined annotation-dependent depletion (CADD), and compared with the mutation significance cutoff (MSC), a gene-level specific cutoff for CADD scores (http://pec630.rockefeller.edu:8080/MSC/).

We compared the survival of patients with forkhead domain-affecting and other FOXP3 mutations for whom sufficient data were available using the Gehan’s generalised Wilcoxon test. This included patients who underwent HSCT or died in utero. We also employed Fisher’s test to investigate the proportions of patients surviving beyond the age of three years (the median of follow-up) depending on the presence or absence of this type of mutation (two-tailed p value reported). The age at onset in the two groups was compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. The alpha level was set at 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica 12 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, USA).

Results

Demographic Data

Twenty-seven male infants, two brothers who died in utero (in the 19th and 24th week of gestation) and one preterm neonate (32nd week of gestation) from 26 families were included in this study (Table 1). None of the families were consanguineous. Nineteen patients have been previously described in cohort studies or as case reports514. The median age at disease onset was 1.5 month [first to third quartile; 0–84]. The median duration of follow-up was 4 years [0–22] and the average of age at last follow-up was 7.6 years.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the French IPEX cohort

Pts Mutation CADD Age at onset Diar Diab Ecz Other AIE-75 kDa Auto-immunity Therapy Complications Follow-up Reported by
1 g.−6247_−4859delGAG 3 wk + + Allergy (food), cheilitis and sepsis + AEA PN, Ctc, Aza, Rapa, FK506 Infliximab and HSCT TM with ESRF pulmonary infection, acute pancreatitis, and osteopenia Death 10.5 y 6, 10
2 g.−6247_−4859delGAG 5 wk + + Allergy (food), cheilitis, sepsis and HP gastritis + AEA Ctc, Aza, Rapa, Cyclo and FK506 Pulmonary adenoviral infection, BPNP and BD Alive 14.5 y 6, 10
3 c.751_753 delGAG 4 wk + + + AHA, agranulocytosis and hepatitis + AEA, ANA, anti-islet, SMA, Coombs, anti-PNN and anti-GAD PN, Ctc, Aza, FK506 and Rituximab AHA, Pseudomonas infection and BD Death 8 mo 6, 11
4 c.751_753 delGAG 6 wk + + Hypothyroidism, interstitial nephritis and AHA + AEA PN, Ctc, Aza, MTX, FK506, Rapa, Rituximab and HSCT Rectal abscess, colostomy, cholangitis, EBV reactivation, BD, VZV infection, intracranial haemorrhage, cataract and bones fracture Alive 17 y 6, 11
5 c.736 − 1G > C 24 7 wk + + + Allergy (food) ANA, anti-insulin and anti-GAD PN and Rapa Pulmonary infection and BD Alive 5 y
6 c.816 + 5G > A 11 4 wk + + + + AEA, anti-insulin and anti-enterocyte PN, Ctc, Aza, Rapa and FK506 PNP and VZV infection wt hepatitis Alive 14 y 6
7 c.1121T > G 27 4 wk + + AHA, thrombocytopenia and allergy + na Ctc, Aza, FK506 and Rapa Death during HSCT induction therapy Death 14 mo 6, 10, 11
8 c.1113T > G 23 4 wk + + + Anaemia ANA and anti-GAD PN, Ctc, FK506 and HSCT Death 3 y 8
9 c.210delG 6 wk + + + na PN, Ctc, FK506 and HSCT Death 1.5 y
10 c.1015C > G 24 1 wk + + + AHA + AEA FK506 Septicaemia Death 7 mo 11
11 c.1100T > G 27 3 mo + + + Tubulointerstitial nephritis + AEA, ANA, anti-GAD and anti-mitoch Cts, Cyclo and ALS Death 2 y 10
12 c.751_753 delGAG 27 1 wk + + + Membranous glomerulonephritis na AEA, ANA, SMA and anti-keratin Cts, Cyclo and ALS Recurrent infections (S. hominis. S, epidermidis) Na 6
13 c.736 − 1G > A 24 8 wk + + + Anaemia, thrombocytopenia and membranous glomerulonephritis na AEA, ANA, anti-GAD, anti-mitoch and anti-platelet Ctc, Cyclo and ALS Recurrent infections (S. epidermidis, S. aureus) Na 6
14 c.152G > A 20 10 mo + + cANCA, ANA and anti-colonocyte 5-ASA, Ctc, Aza and FK506 / Alive 4.5 y
15 c.−23 + 1G > A 24 8 wk + + Allergy (food++), anaemia and thrombocytosis PN Food allergy Alive 3.3 y
16 c.817A > C 5 7 y + + + AEA Rapa Interstitial nephritis secondary to Cyclo Alive 10 y 9
17 c.1091A > G 26 24 days + + Allergy (food) + PN, Aza and FK506 Alive 19 y
18 c.264delC 5 y + + Tubulo-interstitial nephritis, allergy (food) + Anti-GAD Renal transplantation, Ctc, Rapa, MFM, FK506, ALS and HST Diabetes under Ctc. exocrine pancreatitis, CMV and EBV reactivation, TM, Pseudomonas infection and digestive GvHD Death 7.3 y
19 c.1157G > A 34 4 wk + + HMG with severe hepatitis, thrombocytopenia na na Ctc, Rapa IV and Alemtuzumab CMV infection and MRSA infection Death 7 mo
20 c.1010G > A 33 4 wk + + Respiratory failure + Anti-GAD PN, Rapa, Ins, noninvasive ventilation and HSCT TM Alive 1 y
21 c.227delT 3 wk + + Autoimmune hepatitis and membranous glomerulonephritis + Anti-actin, anti-TPO, ANA and AEA PN, Ctc, Cyclo and Aza Multiple flare-ups. and steroid-induced osteopenia Alive 22 y 7, 12
22 c.227delT 2 wk + + na na PN Death 6 wk 7
23 c.816 +4A > G 7 8 wk + + Cow’s milk protein allergy, asthma, SA and tubulointerstitial nephritis + Anti-actin PN, Ctc, Cyclo and Aza Septicaemia (E. coli) Death 3 y 5
24 c.−23 + 5G > A 12 3 wk + + + Arthritis + Anti-thyroglobulin, ASCA and ANCA PN and Ins Alive 5 y
25 c.-23 + 5G > A 12 13 mo + + + + ASCA, anti-islet cell, anti-GAD and anti-TG PN, Ins and Gluten eviction Coeliac disease Alive 3 y
26 c.1189C > T 33 Birth + + na na PN Septicaemia (E. coli) Death day 4
27 c.1033C > T 24 IU na na IFD 13
28 c.1033C > T 24 IU na na IFD 13
29 c.751_753 delGAG 2 mo + + Hypothyroidism + Anti-pancreas (exocrine) and anti-thyroglobulin Rapa, Ctc and PN S. haemolyticus sepsis Alive 3 y
30 c.1015C > T 25 4 wk + + Cow’s milk protein allergy + AEA, ANA, anti-GAD, ANCA and anti-platelet PN, Rapa IV, Ctc, Ruxo, Rituximab and HSCT Pneumopathy complicated by septicaemia (P. aeruginosa) Alive 6 mo

AEA anti-enterocyte antibodies; AHA autoimmune haemolytic anaemia; ALS antilymphocyte serum; ANA antinuclear antibodies; ANCA antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies; ASCA anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies; anti-GAD anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies; anti-mitoch. anti-mitochondria antibodies; anti-TG anti-transglutaminase antibodies; anti-TPO anti-thyroperoxidase antibody; AZA azathioprine; BD bronchial dilatation; CADD combined annotation-dependent depletion; Ctc corticoids; Cyclo cyclosporine; Diar diarrhoea; Diab diabetes; Ecz eczema; ESRF end-stage renal failure; GvHD graft versus host disease; HMG hepatomegaly; HP Helicobacter pylori; HSCT hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IFD intrauterine foetal death; Ins insulin; IV intravenous; MFM mycophenolate mofetil; mo month; MRSA methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MTX methotrexate; na not available; PN parenteral nutrition; Rapa rapamycin; Ruxo ruxolitinib; SMA smooth muscle antibodies; TM thrombotic microangiopathies; wk week; y year.

Clinical and Biological Data

Chronic diarrhoea was the most frequent symptom: it was the initial symptom in 18 patients (68%) and was present in 28 patients (100%) during the course of the disease (Table 1). Skin lesions were mainly eczematous and were associated with diarrhoea in 22 patients (78%). Erythroderma was the first and main symptom in patients (pts) 7 and 26. In seven patients, the first clinical manifestation was T1D, at a median age of 1.5 months [0–13 months]. Twelve patients (43%) developed T1D during the course of the disease. Nine of them (75%) had positive anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase or anti-islet antibodies.

Ten patients (35%) developed severe food allergy. The main incriminated food antigen was cow’s milk protein, with presence of specific IgE in all tested patients. Among these patients, pt15 presented at the age of 2 months with severe diarrhoea associated with cow’s milk protein allergy. Although diarrhoea resolved spontaneously, his food allergy extended to eggs, exotic fruits, nuts, soy, beef and veal without any other intestinal or extra-intestinal symptoms.

Haematological disorders occurred in eight patients (29%), six had anaemia (positive Coomb’s test n = 4), three had thrombocytopenia (anti-platelet antibodies n = 2) and one had neutropenia with antineutrophil antibodies.

Eight patients (25%) developed nephropathy (median age 3 years [1.8–9]). Interstitial nephropathy was described in five cases (pts 4, 11, 16, 18 and 23) among them, in three most probably linked to cyclosporine medication (pts 11, 16 and 23). Three patients presented glomerulonephritis linked to the disease (pts 12, 13 and 21). Chronic nephritis was the initial manifestation in pt 18; it led to chronic renal failure that required peritoneal dialysis at the age of five followed by kidney transplantation at the age of six.

Four (14%) patients developed hepatitis, with presence of anti-smooth muscle autoantibodies in two cases (pts 3 and 21). One case of hepatitis occurred during mercaptopurine therapy (pt 17).

Twenty-one out of 23 tested patients (91%) had markedly elevated IgE, ranging between 94 and 12,000 kUI/L (N < 40 kUI/l). Autoantibodies to AIE 75 kDa, directed against harmonin, a brush border protein15, were found in 22 out of the 23 tested patients (95%). Twenty patients showed positive auto-antibodies against various targets (summarised in Table 1). Among them, 13 patients showed positive anti-enterocyte antibodies. No auto-antibody was detected in two patients (pts 15 and 17). Peripheral Tregs were analysed in ten subjects. In three children (pts 1, 2 and 3), CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ Tregs represented less than 1% of peripheral CD4+ T (normal range: 5–10%). Patients 8, 10 and 21 had reduced levels 3.0%, 3.3% and 1.5%, respectively. In contrast, Tregs numbers were normal in pts 7 (8.0%), 24 (7.5%), 25 (11.0%) and 30 (7.5%), while the mean of fluorescence was decreased in pt 25 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Evaluation of regulatory T cells frequency in an atypical IPEX case.

Fig. 1

a Flow cytometry on isolated PBMCs from patient 25 and a healthy control subject after membrane staining with CD3 and CD4 and intracellular staining of FOXP3. b Mean fluorescence intensity of FOXP3 in CD3+CD4+ cells in control and patient 25

Three patients with atypical phenotypes were included (pts 15, 24 and 25). Patients 15 and 24 presented severe diarrhoea early in their life, which resolved without immunosuppressive therapy. One is now 4-year-old with a severe food allergy and the second has T1D. Pt 25, a cousin of pt 24 presented with late onset diabetes at the age of 13 months without gastro-intestinal tract involvement. He later developed a “coeliac-like” disease with positive anti-transglutaminase antibody and severe villous atrophy. Despite high AIE-75 kDa, hypereosinophilia and elevated total IgE pts 24 and 25 had a normal frequency of Tregs (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Histological analysis of neonatal IPEX form.

Fig. 2

a Standard autopsy picture of patient 26, showing diffuse skin erythema and b haematoxylin–eosin standard staining of an intestinal biopsy showing mononuclear infiltrate of the intestinal chorion

Endoscopic and histological data

Nineteen patients underwent at least one endoscopic procedure during the course of the disease. Six patients presented only inflammation in the upper gastro-intestinal tract with pale and fragile mucosa (pts 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 23). Patient 25 presented severe duodenal villous atrophy associated with high level of anti-transglutaminase. Seven patients had a combination of upper gastrointestinal and colon inflammation with severe inflammation and ulcerations at onset of symptoms (pts 1, 2, 4, 16, 19, 21 and 24). Patient 14 displayed only colitis and pt29 an ileocolitis. Endoscopy showed normal mucosa in pt5 despite severe diarrhoea, for pt18, who was under immunosuppressive therapy in the context of a pre-transplant work-up. Also, no macroscopic inflammation was reported for pt15 during a classical evaluation of the disease course.

Duodenal biopsies showed polymorphic infiltration of the lamina propria with lymphocytes, macrophages, plasmocytes and eosinophils. Histologic analysis of the lower part of the gut (colon sigmoid and rectum) highlighted an inflammatory infiltrate of the lamina propria with a predominance of lymphocytes and eosinophils.

Autopsy of pt26, who died in the neonatal period, showed CD3+CD4+ lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrates of the skin, the digestive tract, the pancreas and of the liver as well (Fig. 2).

FOXP3 mutations

Molecular diagnosis was obtained by targeted Sanger sequencing. Median age at molecular diagnosis was 5 years [0.25–8] and 4 years for patients born after 2001 (the discovery of FOXP3 as disease causing mutation).

As shown in Fig. 3, 22 germinal mutations were identified in our cohort. Amongst these variants, four novel missense mutations were identified: c.−23 + 1G > A (pt 15), c.−23 + 5G > A (pts 24 and 25) c.1015C > T (pt30), c.1091A > G (pt17) and one nucleotide deletion mutation c.264delC (pt18), which resulted in a frameshift and introduced a premature stop codon. The first two variants were designated as splice-altering by in silico splicing defect predictions tools while they were all absent from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) database. Of note, the CADD of c.−23 + 1G > A (24), c.−23 + 5G > A (12), c.1015C > T (25) and c.1091A > G (26) were well above the MSC of FOXP3 (0.002) (Table 1).

Fig. 3. FOXP3 mutations in the cohort.

Fig. 3

Schematic representation of the FOXP3 gene with all the mutations found in our IPEX patients indicated

Treatment and outcome

The mean follow-up was 5 years (range: 0–22), two patients were lost to follow-up, and 10-year survival was 43% (Fig. 4a). Twenty-three patients received steroids. During the course of the disease, 13 patients took azathioprine and 2 were treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Five patients died during the first year of life due to multiorgan failure caused by severe diarrhoea (pts 3, 7, 10, 19, 22 and 25), at a median age of 5 months (0–9). Three patients died during a flare-up of their disease or due to Escherichia coli septicaemia and multiple organ failure (pts 9, 11 and 23). Three patients improved on tacrolimus (pts 6, 14 and 16) and four on sirolimus medication (pts 2, 5, 20 and 30). Among them two were also receiving azathioprine (pts 2 and 6). One patient was treated by cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids (pt 21). Three patients never received immunosuppressive therapy (pts 15, 24 and 25).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

a Survival of IPEX patients in the French cohort. b Kaplan–Meier curves illustrating the poorer survival of IPEX patients harbouring forkhead (FKH) domain-affecting FOXP3 mutations as compared with other mutations

Seven patients underwent HSCT at a mean age of 5.5 years (range: 0.5–12.8) (Table 2). Two patients were transplanted with a matched sibling donor, three patients (pts 9, 18 and 30) with a mismatched related donor and two patients (pts 1 and 20) with a matched unrelated donor. Conditioning regimens (CR) are given in Table 2. Five patients displayed full engraftment, one patient transplanted with a non-myeloablative CR showed mixed chimerism, while one patient (pt9) failed to engraft. Four patients died after HSCT, due to graft-versus-host disease and transplant-related toxicities (microangiopathies and renal failure) (n = 2), graft rejection (n = 1) or hemophagocytosis at 30 months post-transplant (pt8).

Table 2.

Outcomes in IPEX patients treated by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Pt Age at onset Age at BMT Mutation Conditionning Donor GvH prevention Remission after transplantation GvHD Complication post after transplantation Outcome
1 1 mo 10.5 g.-6247_-4859 delGAG Flu, ALM and Bu (RIC) MUD Steroids/MMF / Acute grade II Microangiopathies and renal failure Death 10.5 y
4 1.5 mo 12.8 c.751_753 delGAG Flu, ALM and Bu (RIC) MSD CY/MMF Yes Absence Alive 17 y
8 1 mo 0.5 c.1113T > G ATG, CY and Bu (MAC) MSD CY IV Yes Absence Hemophagocytosis Death 3 y
9 1.5 mo 1 c.210delG ATG, BU and CY (MAC) MMRD CY/MMF / Absence Graft rejection Death 1.5 y
18 5 y 7 c.264delC flu, Cx, TBI 2GY and post CY (NMA) MMRD CY/MMF / Grade III Microangiopathies and renal failure Death 7.3 y
20 1 mo 1 c.1010G > A flu, Bu and ALM MUD CY/MMF Yes Grade III Alive 2 y
30 1 mo 5.5 c.1015C > T Ritu, ALM, Bu, Flu and post CY (MAC) MMRD CY/MMF Yes Chronic Alive 1.5 y

ALM alemtuzumab; ATG anti-thymoglobulin; Bu busulfan; CY cyclophosphamide; post CY post-transplant cyclophosphamide; BM bone marrow; Flu fludarabine; RIC reduced intensity conditioning; MAC myeloablative conditioning; NMA non myeloablative conditioning; GvHD graft-versus-host disease; Melph melphalan; mo month; MSD matched sibling donor; MUD matched unrelated donor; MMRD: mis-matched related donor, Pts patients; TBI total body irradiation; y year, MMF mycophenolate mofetil; TM thrombotic microangiopathies; ESRF end-stage renal failure

The survival of children harbouring forkhead domain-affecting mutations (both missense and frameshift; n = 15) was poorer than that of children with other mutations (n = 14; p = 0.002; Fig. 4b). Amongst the 12 patients who died before the age of three, 10 harboured a forkhead domain-affecting mutation (83.3%) (p = 0.005). Only three patients with a similar mutation survived beyond the age of three years (23.1%) (p = 0.005). The age at onset of the disease did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.14).

Discussion

Our national multicentre cohort of 30 IPEX patients unravels an enlarged clinical spectrum of IPEX with atypical phenotypes, and mild evolutions in some patients even without therapy. These observations are particularly important when defining the most appropriate treatment strategy while looking for genetic prognostic factor.

In 2012, Barzaghi et al. comprehensively reviewed all 136 cases described in the previous 12 years with the aim to define the clinical features of the syndrome16. The major elements of the clinical picture were: diarrhoea, T1D, and skin involvement. In our study the prevalence of all three main symptoms was in keeping (less than 15% difference) with this previous report16. Diarrhoea was the leading manifestation, present in 100% of patients and often life-threatening. Eczematous skin lesions concerned nearly three-quarters of cases. Almost half of the children had T1D; in most of them it was the first manifestation of IPEX. One in five subjects had renal disorders. Of particular interest, we observed a large percentage of food allergic patients in our cohort, 35% compared to 11% in the previous report. We suggest that because of a high rate of allergic symptoms, clinicians should carefully consider the introduction of complementary foods in IPEX patients.

Our study described several unusual phenotypes. Patient 18 presented first with renal tubulo-interstitial nephritis, which required renal transplantation and he developed classical severe diarrhoea only 1 year after organ transplant. A 7-month-old baby boy who exhibited a glomerulonephritis in the absence of any digestive problems was also previously reported, suggesting indeed that renal disorder could be the first manifestation of the disease17. Mutations in the FKH domain interfere with nuclear import and DNA binding, both of which are critical for FOXP3 repressor activity. These latter mutations may also be associated with more attenuated phenotypes.

Our cohort includes three patients with atypical phenotypes (pts 15, 24, and 25). Despite severe diarrhoea early in life, none of them needed immunosuppressive therapy. Two novel mutations were identified in the three patients: c.−23 + 1G > A and c.−23 + 5G > A. Interestingly, in pt 25 a decreased FOXP3 expression was observed on CD3+CD4+FOXP3+ cells compared to control despite normal frequency of Tregs (Fig. 1). All three patients (15, 24 and 25) carry intronic mutations located within the first splice donor site. Mutations outside FOXP3 coding regions, within an intron/exon splice junction or in the first polyadenylation signal of the gene, may interfere with normal gene expression and protein production. Moreover, it has been shown the first splice donor site is highly methylated due to the presence of multiple conserved noncoding enhancer sequences, responsible of epigenetic regulation18. As they are both hypomorphic mutations, we speculate that variants in this particular region might affect the overall methylation status leading to a decreased FOXP3 expression and resulting in an atypical phenotype.

We also report a new IPEX case of a preterm infant with severe erythroderma (pt26) who died of septicaemia at day four of life. Although autoimmune diseases in utero are very rare, the number of reported neonatal cases of IPEX has been increasing since the first description in 2015 (13). Foetal and neonatal forms of IPEX indicate that the disease could start in utero, which suggests that Tregs are important for foetal tolerance.

A large variety of autoantibodies are described in IPEX. Anti-harmonin (anti-AIE75 kDa) is the most specific antibody in IPEX-patients, even though it has also been described in CD25 deficiency15. Totally, 90% of patients described herein had a positive anti-AIE75 kDa serology. Therefore, we find it to be a useful tool for the preliminary screening of patients that may possibly distinguish between IPEX syndrome and other immune deficiencies, such as autoimmune polyendocrinopathy–candidiasis–ectodermal dystrophy19. In our experience, severity and evolution of the disease do not correlate with the titre of anti-AIE75 kDa. In four of our patients who previously had positive anti-AIE75 kDa titres the antibodies have become undetectable under therapy. Indeed, it was shown that anti-AIE75 kDa in IPEX patients become undetectable or persist at low titres in remission after immunosuppressive therapy or HSCT20.

The largest yet still homogenous group of pathogenic variants that we could identify were mutations affecting the forkhead domain of FOXP3. In our cohort, the survival of patients with variants of this type was markedly poorer and rarely exceeded three years. This highlights its potential use as a genetic prognostic factor in IPEX. Our exploratory search for associations between phenotypic traits and forkhead domain-affecting FOXP3 mutations yielded negative results. The lack of genotype–phenotype correlation may reflect the complex intracellular interactions of FOXP3, and strongly suggests the role of epigenetic regulation in determining the clinical picture and outcome (18). The range of manifestations and severity can also vary between patients with the same mutation, suggesting that modifier loci in the genetic background, as HLA haplotype and the lymphocyte repertoires, and/or environmental exposures modify the course of disease.

Lack of Tregs lead indirectly to a deregulation of T effector with an enrichment of T helper type 2 cells, an over production of IL-17 cytokines and a deregulation of autoreactive B cells (21). This balance between regulatory cells and effector cells could change from a patient to another.

The two main treatment modalities for IPEX syndrome are chronic immunosuppression and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Immunosuppressive therapy has to be introduced as soon as possible in order to limit any further damage. In our study, 25 patients received steroids, which appear to be the most efficacious first-line pharmacotherapy, then followed by other immunosuppressive agents for long-term therapy. As observed in this series, combination of at least two immunosuppressive drugs is needed to control the disease. In our cohort, only two patients improved on tacrolimus alone and three on sirolimus alone. We made a greater use of azathioprine with tacrolimus compared with previous reports, where mycophenolate mofetil was a common choice. Classically, a top-down approach with initial steroids and sirolimus is advised (approx. 0.15 mg/kg/day), adjusted to maintain serum sirolimus levels between 8 and 12 ng/mL21. In the majority of cases, chronic immunosuppression is partially effective, and increases the risks of severe and/or opportunistic infections.

HSCT is currently the only curative therapy for IPEX. HSCT was initially proposed after multiple relapses and when combination immunosuppressive therapy had been tried and failed. Early HSCT seems to lead to better outcomes. Fifteen IPEX patients treated by HSCT were described so far in the literature. Most of them (10/15) received the transplant in their first two years of life with a large survival rate (90%). A recent study by Nademi et al.22 also supports this observation: of five infants who had HSCT in the first year of life (two at six months and three at ten months) all patients survived. In our patients the median age at HSCT was 5.5 (range: 0.5–12.8) years.

In conclusion, IPEX is phenotypically heterogeneous ranging from severe intrauterine forms to moderate phenotypes with atypical course of the disease which do not require extensive immunosuppressive treatment. Early FOXP3 sequencing facilitates rapid diagnosis, which is necessary since it permits aggressive, combined immunosuppressive therapy and opens the way to early HSCT.

Study Highlights

What is current knowledge?

  • Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome is an autoimmune genetic disorder.

  • Main clinical features include severe refractory enteropathy, type 1 diabetes and dermatitis.

  • Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only known curative treatment.

What is new here?

  • FOXP3 mutations localised in the first intron can produce atypical, attenuated phenotypes.

  • Mutations affecting the forkhead domain are associated with poor survival.

  • Five new FOXP3 mutations leading to IPEX phenotype are identified: c.−23 + 1 G > A, c.−23 + 5G > A, c.264delC, c.1015C > T and c.1091A > G.

  • Immunosuppressive therapy may yield excellent results in selected patients.

Competing interests

Guarantor of the article: Dr. Rémi Duclaux-Loras.

Specific authors’ contributions: Study concept and design: R.D.-L., F.C.-H., B.N., J.N., F.R., A.L. and N.C.-B.; patient care coordination: A.L., F.R., F.R.-L., S.C.-F., J.B., P.F.R., D.M. and O.G; acquisition of data: R.D.-L., B.N., S.C.-F., C.M. and P.F.R; analysis and interpretation of data: RD-L, FC-H, FR, AL, FR-L, CL, NC-B; manuscript writing: R.D.-L., F.C.-H., J.N., F.R., A.L. and B.N.

Financial support: J.N. received a stipend from the Polish National Science Centre 2015/16/T/NZ5/00168.

Potential competing interests: None.

Footnotes

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Powell BR, Buist NR, Stenzel P. An X-linked syndrome of diarrhea, polyendocrinopathy, and fatal infection in infancy. J. Pediatr. 1982;100:731–737. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80573-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chatila TA, et al. JM2, encoding a fork head-related protein, is mutated in X-linked autoimmunity-allergic disregulation syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 2000;106:R75–R81. doi: 10.1172/JCI11679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Godfrey VL, Wilkinson JE, Russell LB. X-linked lymphoreticular disease in the scurfy (sf) mutant mouse. Am. J. Pathol. 1991;138:1379–1387. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Katoh H, Zheng P, Liu Y. FOXP3: genetic and epigenetic implications for autoimmunity. J. Autoimmun. 2013;41:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2012.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harbuz R, et al. Identification of new FOXP3 mutations and prenatal diagnosis of IPEX syndrome. Prenat. Diagn. 2010;30:1072–1078. doi: 10.1002/pd.2613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Moes N, et al. Reduced expression of FOXP3 and regulatory T-cell function in severe forms of early-onset autoimmune enteropathy. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:770–778. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lachaux A, et al. Familial autoimmune enteropathy with circulating anti-bullous pemphigoid antibodies and chronic autoimmune hepatitis. J. Pediatr. 1994;125:858–862. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)81999-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Baud O, et al. Treatment of the immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome (IPEX) by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:1758–1762. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200106073442304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bindl L, et al. Successful use of the new immune-suppressor sirolimus in IPEX (immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome) J. Pediatr. 2005;147:256–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.04.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Patey-Mariaud de Serre N, et al. Digestive histopathological presentation of IPEX syndrome. Mod. Pathol. 2009;22:95–102. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2008.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Halabi-Tawil M, et al. Cutaneous manifestations of immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome. Br. J. Dermatol. 2009;160:645–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08835.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Duclaux-Loras Rémi, Collardeau-Frachon Sophie, Nancey Stephane, Fabien Nicole, Kaiserlian Dominique, Lachaux Alain. Long-term disease course in a patient with severe neonatal IPEX syndrome. Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology. 2015;39(4):e43–e47. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2015.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vasiljevic A, et al. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome and recurrent intrauterine fetal death. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2015;385:2120. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60773-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Torgerson TR, et al. Severe food allergy as a variant of IPEX syndrome caused by a deletion in a noncoding region of the FOXP3 gene. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:1705–1717. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kobayashi I, et al. A 75-kD autoantigen recognized by sera from patients with X-linked autoimmune enteropathy associated with nephropathy. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1998;111:527–531. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00523.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Barzaghi F, Passerini L, Bacchetta R. Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome: a paradigm of immunodeficiency with autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2012;3:211. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sheikine Y, et al. Renal involvement in the immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) disorder. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2015;30:1197–1202. doi: 10.1007/s00467-015-3102-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zheng Y, et al. Role of conserved non-coding DNA elements in the Foxp3 gene in regulatory T-cell fate. Nature. 2010;463:808–812. doi: 10.1038/nature08750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chida N, et al. Disease specificity of anti-tryptophan hydroxylase-1 and anti-AIE-75 autoantibodies in APECED and IPEX syndrome. Clin. Immunol. 2015;156:36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lampasona V, et al. Autoantibodies to harmonin and villin are diagnostic markers in children with IPEX syndrome. PloS One. 2013;8:e78664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bacchetta R., Barzaghi F., Roncarolo M.-G. From IPEX syndrome to FOXP3 mutation: a lesson on immune dysregulation. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. Published Online First: 2016. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 22.Nademi Z, et al. Single centre experience of haematopoietic SCT for patients with immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:310–312. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology are provided here courtesy of American College of Gastroenterology

RESOURCES