Table 3.
Path coefficients and model-fit indices for hypothesized mediation models (N = 148).
| Model 1: Path analysis T2 |
Model 2: Path analysis T3 |
Model 3: Mediation T3 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ß | 95% CI | ß | 95% CI | ß | 95% CI | |
| Direct effects | ||||||
| Intervention → Cyberbullying | −0.42∗∗∗ | [−0.59 to −0.25] | −0.29∗∗ | [−0.51 to −0.07] | −0.29∗∗ | [−0.49 to −0.09] |
| Intervention→ Emotional Competencies | −0.05 | [−0.17 to 0.07] | 0.31∗∗∗ | [0.19 to 0.43] | 0.24∗∗ | [0.07 to 0.40] |
| Intervention →Life satisfaction | −0.06 | [−0.18 to 0.06] | 0.16∗∗ | [0.04 to 0.28] | −0.17 | [−0.51 to 0.16] |
| Cyberbullying → Life satisfaction | – | – | – | – | −0.73 | [−1.58 to 0.12] |
| Emotional Intelligence → Life satisfaction | – | – | – | – | 0.44∗∗∗ | [0.24 to 0.64] |
| Indirect effects | ||||||
| Intervention → Cyberbullying → Life satisfaction | – | – | – | – | 0.21 | [−0.13 to 0.56] |
| Intervention → Emotional Competencies → Life satisfaction | – | – | – | – | 0.10∗∗ | [0.02 to 0.19] |
| Model-fit indices | ||||||
| χ2(df) | 87.98 (46) | 84.61 (47) | 77.25 (47) | |||
| Δχ2(df) | 1.87 | 1.80 | 1.64 | |||
| CFI | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.95 | |||
| TFI | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.91 | |||
| RMSEA [90% CI] | 0.07 [0.05–0.10] | 0.07 [0.05–0.09] | 0.06 [0.04–0.09] | |||
| SRMR | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.06 | |||
β, standardized path coefficient; CI, confidence interval; χ2, Chi-Square Test of Model Fit; df, degrees of freedom; CFI, comparative fit index; TFI, Tucker-Lewis index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean square residuals; ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.