Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 17;11(10):2007. doi: 10.3390/ma11102007

Table 2.

Histomorphometric evaluation of soft tissue adaption after 8 weeks healing. Grouped data are presented for each neck design and for implants of similar design (micro-rings compared with open-thread). Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Type of Implants PM-BC PM-BIC PM-JE JE-BIC PM-IS
B L B L B L B L B L
Grouped Micro-rings 3.23(0.88) 2.33(0.35) 3.38(0.77) 3.04(0.97) 1.50(0.36) a 1.39(0.40) a 1.88(0.66) 1.65(0.86) 1.62(1.19) 1.44(0.92)
Open-Thread 2.57(0.93) 1.69(0.80) 3.03(0.80) 2.41(0.84) 1.08(0.42) a 0.92(0.46) a 1.94(0.73) 1.49(0.75) 2.00(0.61) 1.78(0.65)
Micro-rings Blue Sky 3.40(0.90) 2.29(0.13) 3.40(0.90) 2.34(0.11) b 1.49(0.20) 1.32(0.16) 1.90(0.89) 1.01(0.25) b 1.71(0.92) 1.29(0.66)
Micro-rings C1 3.06(0.92) 2.38(0.51) 3.37(0.72) 3.73(0.16) b 1.51(0.51) 1.45(0.56) 1.85(0.43) 2.28(0.78) b 1.52(1.53) 1.59(1.20)
Open-thread IPX 3.15(0.68) 1.79(0.79) 3.19(0.63) 2.38(0.68) 1.34(0.20) c 1.00(0.32) 1.85(0.16) 1.37(0.40) 1.69(0.52) 1.44(0.47)
Open-thread Facility 2.20(0.91) 1.68(1.09) 3.00(1.00) 2.55(1.14) 0.86(0.39) c 0.86(0.57) 2.13(0.99) 1.69(1.15) 2.30(0.57) 2.01(0.53)

(a) p < 0.05 for grouped neck design; (b) p < 0.05 for different implants with micro-rings; (c) p < 0.05 for different implants with open-thread design.