Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 3;10(10):1420. doi: 10.3390/nu10101420

Table 4.

Linear regression models explaining the associations between anthropometric z-score and selected covariates.

HAZ WHZ
N Unadjusted a Adjusted b Unadjusted a Adjusted b
Coeff. C.I p Value Coeff. C.I. p Value Coeff. C.I p Value Coeff C.I. p Value
Giardia
No 464 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Yes 129 −0.27 (−0.47, −0.06) 0.012 −0.07 (−0.27, 0.13) 0.501 −0.06 (−0.25, 0.12) 0.516 0.10 (−0.09, 0.28) 0.317
Have Pig
No 364 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Yes 229 −0.20 (−0.38, −0.01) 0.035 −0.05 (−0.23, 0.13) 0.595 −0.23 (−0.40, −0.07) 0.005 −0.21 (−0.37, −0.04) 0.014
Wealth index
Poor 290 - - - - - -
Middle 167 0.30 (0.10, 0.50) 0.003 0.18 (−0.02, 0.38) 0.071
Rich 136 0.56 (0.34, 0.77) <0.001 0.38 (0.16, 0.6) <0.001
Mother Education
No education 171 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Primary 263 0.31 (0.09, 0.52) 0.005 0.20 (−0.01, 0.41) 0.068 0.11 (−0.09, 0.30) 0.278 0.05 (−0.14, 0.24) 0.600
Secondary and more 159 0.56 (0.32, 0.81) <0.001 0.41 (0.16, 0.66) <0.001 0.30 (0.08, 0.52) 0.008 0.27 (0.05, 0.50) 0.019
Sanitation facilities
Non improved 389 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Improved 204 0.36 (0.18, 0.53) <0.001 0.20 (0.02, 0.38) 0.032 0.15 (−0.01, 0.31) 0.059 0.10 (−0.06, 0.26) 0.226
Gender
Female 301 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Male 292 −0.13 (−0.31, 0.04) 0.126 −0.15 (−0.31, 0.01) 0.067 0.00 (−0.15, 0.15) 0.995 0.01 (−0.14, 0.16) 0.912
Region
Female 302 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Male 291 -0.35 (−0.52, −0.18) <0.001 −0.18 (−0.36, 0.00) 0.050 −0.28 (−0.43, −0.12) <0.001 −0.14 (−0.31, 0.02) 0.093

HAZ = Height for Age z-scores. WHZ= Weight for Age z-scores. Wealth index variables was not included in the final model for WHZ; R2 for adjusted HAZ model: 14.2 %, p-Value of the model: 0.00001; R2 for adjusted WHZ model: 9.1%, p-Value of the model: 0.00001; a Have Pig, mother education and sanitation facilites were adjusted for region; b Adjusted for all the covariates in the model, Age and Age squared (coefficients not shown).