Table 2.
Confounding | Selection | Classification of Interventions | Deviations from Interventions | Missing Data | Outcome Measurement | Selection of Reported Results | Overall Risk | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bouvier et al. [21] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Kopac et al. [22] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Ballmer-Weber et al. [23] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ? | ● |
Bohle et al. [24] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Hansen et al. [25] | ● | ? | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Worm et al. [26] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Asero et al. [27] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Bolhaar et al. [28] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ? | ● | ● |
Kootstra et al. [29] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
Vlieg-Boerstra et al. [30] | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● |
* The Robins-I tool was used for Risk of Bias assessment [19]; ● = low risk of bias; ● = moderate risk of bias; ● = high risk of bias; ? = unclear risk of bias.