Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 22;10(10):1361. doi: 10.3390/nu10101361

Table 2.

Intervention studies assessing the effects of chronic intake of diets with different GI on appetite/satiety 1.

Study Sample Design Duration Intervention Treatment Effects (Low vs. High GI) Greater Fiber (Low GI)
Pal
et al. [18]
21 overweight/obese adults
Age: 25–65 years
R; X 21 days LGI breakfast replacement
HGI breakfast replacement
↓ Glucose
↔ TG, insulin, LDL-C, HDL-C
↑ Satiety (subj)
Yes for breakfast replacement
No for overall diet (self-reported)
Chang
et al. [19]
80 overweight/obese adults
18–45 years
27.5 ± 5.9 kg/m2
R; X 4 weeks LGL diet
HGL diet
↑ Satiety (subj)
↓ Food cravings
↔ Leptin
Yes
Brownley
et al. [20]
40 women
20 normal weight, 20 obese
≥18 years
R; X 4.5 days
3h PP Responses to last std meal assessed
LGL diet
HGL diet
↓ Glucose, insulin
↑ Ghrelin
↔ Desire to eat (subj)
Significant results only in White women
NR
Krog-Mikkelsen
et al. [21]
29 overweight women
31 ± 7 years
27.6 ± 1.5 kg/m2
R; = 10 weeks
4 h PP Responses to last high or low GI breakfast assessed
LGI diet
HGI diet
↓ Glucose, insulin, GLP-1
↑ Fullness (subj)
↓ Desire to eat fatty food(sub)
↔ GLP-2, glucagon, leptin, ghrelin
↔ Ad libitum energy intake
↔ Substrate oxidation rates
No
Aston
et al. [22]
19 women
34–65 years
25–47 kg/m2
R; X 12-week/phase
No washout
LGI staples
HGI staples
Ad libitum
↔ Body wt, body composition, waist circumference
↔ Hunger, fullness (both subj)
↔ Energy intake
Yes
Das
et al. [23]
34 overweight adults
24–42 years
25–30 kg/m2
R; = 12 months LGL diet
HGL diet
30% energy restriction
↔ Body wt, % Body fat
↔ Hunger, satiety (both subj)
No
Juanola-Falgarona
et al. [24]
122 overweight or obese adults
30–60 years
27–35 kg/m2
R; = 6 months LGI
HGI
HGI-LFat
500 kcal energy restriction
↔ BMI
↔ Hunger, satiety (both subj)
No

1 Abbreviations: GI: glycemic index; GLP: glucagon-like peptide; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; HFat: high fat; HGI: high GI; LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol; LGI: low GI; NR: not reported; PP: postprandial; R: randomized; subj: subjective measure; TG: triglycerides; X: crossover design; =: parallel design; ↓: lower; ↑: higher; ↔: no difference.