Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 7;19(10):3052. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103052

Table A1.

Comparison of prediction accuracy of in the CASP10 test dataset.

Sen Spec Acc Acc-b MCC F1 AUC_ROC AUC_PR
Disembl 0.379 0.954 0.929 0.666 0.286 0.318 0.754 0.295
IUPred 0.168 0.958 0.924 0.563 0.122 0.161 0.618 0.175
VSL2 0.612 0.811 0.803 0.712 0.214 0.213 0.774 0.275
Espritz 0.512 0.921 0.903 0.716 0.298 0.316 0.815 0.404
DISOPRED3 0.362 0.993 0.966 0.678 0.495 0.481 0.860 0.495
PONDRFIT 0.586 0.929 0.914 0.758 0.362 0.374 0.830 0.358
MFDp2 0.325 0.975 0.947 0.650 0.322 0.349 0.778 0.352
IUPred2 0.164 0.959 0.924 0.561 0.119 0.158 0.616 0.170
AUCpreD 0.425 0.984 0.960 0.705 0.465 0.481 0.863 0.501
This work 0.629 0.840 0.831 0.734 0.249 0.245 0.793 0.305

Note Bene. DISOPRED3 is one of the two best predictors in CASP10 competition and therefore was used in the comparison. The other one and its web server were not available when the study was carried out. The highest value in each of these measures is in bold and highlighted (red).