Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;59(7):811–821. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12865

Table 2.

Spearman’s correlations between binary classifications of overall adaptive functioning and domain specific adaptive functioning thresholds and original scale descriptive information.

Domain Overall Adaptive Functioning Family Relations Peer Relations Academic Performance Physical Health Mental Health Substance Use Risk-taking Behavior
Overall Adaptive Functioning 1
Family Relations .47*** 1
Peer Relations .56*** .30*** 1
Academic Performance .65*** .30*** .46*** 1
Physical Health .39*** .23** .10 .25*** 1
Mental Health .48*** .31*** .23** .33*** .27*** 1
Substance Use .34*** .18* .07 .05 .21** .05 1
Risk-taking Behavior .38*** .22** .19* .17* .07 .01 .47*** 1
Original Scale Mean (SD) 5.18 (1.72) 11.11 (3.21) 15.80 (3.58) 15.80 (3.58) 0.38 (0.76) 2. 52 (3.19) 0.69 (0.72) 1.73 (1.55)
Range 0 to 7 3 to 16 5 to 20 3 to 15 0 to 3 0 to 14 0 to 2 0 to 6
Cutoff 6 or higher 9 or higher 16 or higher Regular school and 9 or higher 0 only 2 or lower 0 or 1 3 or lower
N (Percent) Classified as Adaptive Functioning 79 (54%) 118 (80%) 98 (67%) 89 (61%) 111 (76%) 95 (65%) 125 (85%) 125 (85%)
*

Notes. p<.05.

**

p<.01.

***

p<.001.